One fine day in 2014, I returned home after having lived for over 12 years in London. While millions of Bharatiya youth were lined up to get a visa to enter any developed country, I gave up my right to live there. That was when I had a ‘successful’ career, and a house of my own.
Criminals Vs Law Abiding
Seeing the kinds of lessons the children are made to learn through every possible means, its impact on their psyche, and their fundamental understanding, I sensed an undercurrent of subliminal messaging with dangerous intentions on a tectonic scale. The values and virtues that made Britain great are no longer desirable or appreciable. Incompetent people are encouraged to feel superior to the competent. The rights of criminals are given higher importance to the plight of the innocent. The entire social structure is methodically and purposefully subverted to believe in bizarre normalities that could only lead society into unprecedented anarchy, and I didn’t want my children to fall prey to that.
Intellectual and moral subversion of society is an independent subject. But all I want to say for now is that I am glad my children are not in the UK (or for that matter in any ‘developed’ nation.) Because there was a time when law-abiding citizens used to feel safe at any given time, if a person was caught forwarding a video clip of child pornography, he was severely punished. But under the influence of certain subversive ideologies, the very crime of pedophilia is rapidly rephrased as ‘attraction for a minor person’ and soon we will hear that it is an acceptable trait.
Punishing Victims
Today, in the UK when a father tries to rescue his teenage daughter from the captivity of criminals, he is arrested for causing trouble in the neighbourhood. Finally, after three attempts and getting arrested three times, he succeeds in bringing the daughter out and supports her in registering a complaint against those criminals. But then the daughter is arrested for revealing the religion of her rapists.
Rotherham Scandal Timeline
- The grooming gang scandal in the UK has its roots in incidents that took place between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham, South Yorkshire
- Hundreds of girls were sexually exploited by gangs of men.
- On September 13, 2024, the Crown Prosecution Service revealed that seven men were jailed for committing child sex abuse offenses against two young girls in Rotherham during the 2000s
- At least 1,400 children were subjected to appalling sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013
- The case was part of Operation Stovewood, a major investigation by the National Crime Agency into child sexual abuse and exploitation in the town.
- The two victims in this case were just 11 and 15 years old when the abuse began
- The Crown Prosecution Service included Mohammed Amar (42), Mohammed Siyab (44), Yasser Ajaibe (39), Mohammed Zameer Sadiq (49), Abid Saddiq (43), Tahir Yassin (38), and Ramin Bari (37)
Yes. you read right. You are not allowed to reveal the religion of a criminal if the religion is ‘the one’ you just guessed – the ‘peaceful’ religion.
Notorious Grooming Gangs
That is exactly what has been happening throughout the recently resurfaced scandal by the so-called grooming gangs. From as long as 1997, an organised gang used to systematically allure, and seduce young girls to trap them in an emotionally engaged relationship. Soon she would find herself getting raped not just by the ‘boyfriend’ but by multiple men. By the time the girl realised that she was dangerously trapped, in most cases, she was induced into addictions like alcohol and drugs. That made them dependent on those abusers for their supply. Other than being raped, these girls had to go through horrifying atrocities like getting beaten, as many as eight abortions, and sometimes even childbirth. This happened throughout the UK (and also in Europe.) The youngest victim was as young as nine, and the number of identified victims exceeded 1400.
The common factor shared by all the victims was that they were non-Muslim girls (not a single Muslim girl) but the perpetrators were without exception Muslims
The common factor shared by all the victims was that they were non-Muslim girls (not a single Muslim girl) but the perpetrators were without exception Muslims. However, the ‘system’ comprising the police, Government authorities, the media including BBC, and political parties (mainly Labour) tried their best to suppress the perpetrators’ religious aspect. They hid, ignored, and blatantly denied something as clear as daylight. The perpetrators even roamed freely and continued heinous crimes on innocent girls in a rather well-organised way for years.
The girls’ only fault was that she wasn’t a Muslim, and she fell into their trap. Instead, the system collectively victimised the victims and protected the criminals. Whoever tried to raise the horrors was asked to keep silent or even put in prison ‘in the best interest of diversity & pluralism.’ The police officers who showed any concern about these crimes were forced to go through a course in diversity, equality, and inclusion (practically, that means how to ignore, neglect, and forget any crime by the so-called minorities and the deprived classes) and if anyone objected, were branded as racist at work (that means serious career consequences.) The victims who became vocal were made to face the law. In 2008 the Home Office emailed police forces urging them not to investigate the sexual exploitation of young girls as the girls (below the legal age of consent) had made informed choices.
Labour’s Muslim Appeasement
Kier Starmer was the Director of the Public Prosecution Service at that time. Though in 2012, he admitted that the Government failed the rape-gang victims. But not once did he or anyone from the Government or the Leftist media machinery recognise the obvious pattern in the backgrounds of the criminals. Jessica Phillips, under-secretary of state in charge of safeguarding women & girls, was asked by Oldham Council to authorise a Government inquiry into this matter but she refused because Kier Starmer was the new Prime Minister. It was obvious that the inquiry would only expose the Labour Party’s Muslim appeasement which could detrimentally harm their political future. She even called this an exaggerated scandal.
However, when three girls were murdered in Southport, the same Kier Starmer acted quickly to accuse the right wing without any evidence.
The likes of BBC, who had all the time and money to make a documentary in 2024 about the riots in 2002 made sure that these crimes against humanity were received as minor mishaps and the identity of the organised criminals would remain undisclosed. They had the resources to run the story of Akhlaq for over a year but didn’t discuss this industrial-scale raping of innocent underage girls because, in Akhlaq’s case the victim was a Muslim while in these cases the perpetrators were Muslims. The ‘system’ blatantly ignored statistically significant connections to establish the religious angle of such hideous crimes. Instead, they maintained mentioning the perpetrators’ identity as ‘South Asians.’ What exactly does it mean by the way?
And if you wonder about the height of the system’s Muslim appeasement, just imagine that the gang leader of these criminals remained employed by Oldham Council despite being mentioned in the police probe eight times. Manchester Police even said that they didn’t know the ethnicity or religion of the perpetrators. Whose instructions were they following? The selection of facts was politically motivated from the beginning. A senior Labour MP Tony Lloyd explicitly did not want ‘the abuse issue’ linked to Muslims. What was it for, if not for securing the Muslim votes?
The Conservatives too were in power for 14 years. They could have called spade a spade but nothing happened. Though Priti Patel, then Home Secretary, asked for documents related to this crime from the police. But tens of thousands of documents mysteriously vanished. Can you believe that the Home Secretary was not allowed to see those documents? Unbelievable. The police remained compromised throughout. They were more concerned about not being labelled racist or discriminating than their duty. The daunting realities were pushed under the carpet. It was a demoralising assault on British society’s sense of self-esteem.
I’m still unable to comprehend that selfish and myopic politicians can allow a community to become so powerful that the system is forced to compromise with the rule of the law and even justice for the victims by the perpetrators of that community. Despite the victims’ testimony that the criminals were finding support from their religion for their crimes, the system refused to look into that matter. Despite Muslim scholars having said on TV that “Allah allows Muslim men to fight infidels, and take their women as sex slaves,” and all the perpetrators admit to be practicing Muslims, the authorities do not want to consider religion a factor in such crimes.
This issue has opened up Pandora’s Box. The society seriously needs to find answers to questions like while all other communities live cohesively with British life, why does only one community seem to enjoy transgressing the law and challenging the order? Why have the politicians of the developed nations turned so spineless that they can’t find the courage to face the hostile forces, and succumb to them so easily, even intellectually, in agreeing with them on all conflicting matters? Why cannot Muslim youth question the teachings of their religion? The list of questions can go on.
But the most important question in my opinion is what makes the people of a powerful nation so morally weak that their young generation is vulnerable to subversive attacks demoralising them?
Thank God for Elon Musk, because of whom this cancer was exposed. Today it’s Britain. But what guarantee is there that tomorrow it won’t be your country? This question must keep you awake all the time if you are concerned about the future of your generations to come.
Comments