On July 17, 2025, an Additional Sessions Judge in Yamunanagar ordered a seven-year rigorous imprisonment term and Rs 1 lakh fine for Shahbaj for committing love jihad and warned that such practices posed a potential threat to the national integrity. By coming down heavily, the court has made it clear that manipulating personal relationships for communal ends will meet the full force of the law. “Love jihad” is understood as a malicious campaign by certain groups to convert non-Muslim women to Islam through deceit, often involving false promises of love or marriage, and sometimes facilitated by online propaganda and organized networks.
In the Yamunanagar case, Shahbaj had coerced a 14-year-old Hindu girl into a relationship fraudulently, including stalking, intimidation, and repeated sexual advances. The First Information Report invoked criminal conspiracy and intimidation, as well as sexual assault and harassment of a minor. The court, after convicting the accused, imposed consecutive sentences, i.e., four years under POCSO Section 8, two years under Section 12, and one year under BNS Section 351(2). This has sent a strong message that systematic allurement and inducement of minors will be met with the harshest response.
Any instance of child sexual exploitation is deeply horrifying, but when it is interwoven with communal motives, it becomes an attack not only on the individual victim but on societal harmony itself. The POCSO Act was designed to protect children from all forms of sexual abuse, prescribing stringent punishment to act as a deterrent. By emphasizing that offences motivated by religious coercion demand the sternest penalty, the court upheld the Act’s intent and spirit. Additionally, labeling “love jihad” as a threat to national unity elevates such crimes from mere criminal acts to assaults on the very social and secular fabric of the Republic. In certain other cases of love jihad, what has been observed is that there are motives of demographic warfare by altering India’s religious composition through organized conversions.
The Yamunanagar judgment thus advances both justice and public policy. It protects a vulnerable child, deters future conspirators, and reaffirms that personal freedoms cannot be twisted into tools of communal or demographic engineering. By imposing a combined sentence of seven years, the court set an example that offenses against children, especially those rooted in communal conspiracy, will not be tolerated. This landmark ruling sets a clear precedent, urging law enforcement to treat inter-faith coercion with the same rigor used against terrorism and organized crime, and signaling to lawmakers that existing laws should be strengthened wherever gaps remain. In securing justice for the victim and fortifying national cohesion, the landmark decision ensures that manipulative schemes disguised as romance shall not go unpunished.
Comments