In a surprising and politically charged decision, Pakistan has elevated its Army Chief, General Asim Munir, to the honorary rank of Field Marshal, despite the clear failure of Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsoos, the country’s hurried military response to India’s Operation Sindoor. This rare honour, last awarded to Mohammad Ayub Khan, who seized power and was the president of Pakistan from 1958 to 1969. However, this time comes at a time when Pakistan’s armed forces face both strategic and reputational setbacks.
Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsoos: A Dream Crushed Overnight
Operation Sindoor, launched by India, struck multiple terrorist camps across the Line of Control and was successful in destroying key infrastructure supporting cross-border militancy. In retaliation, Pakistan initiated Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsoos, intended to infiltrate Indian positions and revive proxy networks in Kashmir. The plan, however, collapsed within a day. Poor coordination, intelligence lapses, and tactical confusion plagued the operation. Pakistani troops retreated in disarray, with communications intercepted by Indian army revealing that the commander of Pakistan’s 75th Infantry Division ordered an escape while hiding in a mosque.
Pakistan’s failure on the battlefield was compounded by the domestic fallout. Several militant commanders abandoned their posts and attempts to escalate tensions through cross-border shelling backfired. Indian forces responded decisively, further damaging Pakistan’s operational assets. High-resolution satellite imagery captured the destruction of a major terrorist hubs and airbases, further reducing the effectiveness of Pakistan’s anti-India networks.
Field Marshal Title: Islamabad’s Symbol of Fictional Victory
Despite these outcomes, General Munir was promoted to the rank of Field Marshal. The government claimed the move was in recognition of his “exemplary leadership” during the conflict. However, the honour stood in stark contrast to the results on the ground. The timing of the promotion raised questions about the growing influence of the military over Pakistan’s civilian government. The decision resembled historical precedents where military leaders used such titles to consolidate power rather than celebrate genuine victories. The honour also appears to be an attempt by the Pakistani government to construct a narrative of success, an effort to claim symbolic victory over India and mask the operational failure with ceremony. The Pakistan Army have not won the war, but its media machinery and fake news factories narrated its victory.
A Symbolic Rank, a Strategic Failure
The situation has led to speculation about the weakening role of the elected government, with suggestions that Munir is exercising increasing control behind the scenes. The possibility of foreign involvement, particularly from China, also looms large. Given China’s strategic investments in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a military-led administration may offer Beijing greater predictability and alignment with its regional interests, especially considering the threat of Baloch army.
Amid the symbolism and ceremony, Pakistan’s military failure remains undeniable. Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsoos not only failed to counter India’s gains but also exposed the fragility of Pakistan’s internal security strategy. While state media portrayed the operation as a success, the ground reality pointed to a retreat veiled in rhetoric. The Field Marshal title, far from commemorating victory, appears to serve as a facade for defeat, used to mask institutional embarrassment and project an illusion of strength.
The real question now is not about Munir’s title, but about what it represents. In elevating himself after a failed military campaign, he may have secured a ceremonial rank, but at the cost of exposing a deeper truth: this is not the rise of a Field Marshal, but the crowning of a failed marshal who mistook retreat for honour.
Comments