Bengaluru: The removal of Janivara, (sacred thread worn by Brahmin students), during the Common Entrance Test (CET) examination in Shivamogga has ignited widespread outrage among the Brahmin community and has raised serious questions about the respect and understanding of cultural and religious practices within educational institutions. The incident, where officials at Adichunchanagiri College forcibly removed the Janivara from students entering the exam center, has been condemned as not only an affront to religious sentiments but also as a gross violation of students’ rights to practice their religion freely.
Let us first understand the significance of the Janivara, or sacred thread, in Brahmin culture. For countless individuals, the Janivara represents spiritual identity and is a mark of commitment to their religious values and beliefs. It signifies not only a passage into the realm of wisdom and knowledge but also loyalty to the traditions passed down through generations. For students of the Brahmin community who have received Gayatri initiation, donning the Janivara is an important step in their spiritual journey—a commitment to self-realization and adherence to the principles of dharma. By forcibly removing their Janivara, the authorities at the examination center have disrespected not just the students, but their entire cultural heritage.
The leaders of the All Karnataka Brahmin Mahasabha and the Federation of Various Brahmin Sanghas in Shivamogga have rightly condemned this act as anti-Brahmin and anti-Hindu. It is hard to comprehend how individuals entrusted with the responsibility of upholding educational integrity can resort to such an egregious display of ignorance. The very decision to remove religious symbols from a public examination setting sends a chilling message about the state’s respect—or lack thereof—for religious diversity. How can our educational institutions, which are meant to foster an environment of learning and inclusion, engage in discrimination that takes such a dramatic toll on students’ self-worth?
Another incident in Bidar
The case at the CET examination center in Shivamogga has wider implications beyond just a single incident. By stripping away the Janivara, the officials not only disrupted the exam experience for those students but also threatened their future.
A similar incident occurred at the Bidar district’s Saispurthi Examination Center, where a student was forcibly removed from the Mathematics exam after he refused to take off his Janivara. This incident has left him devastated, ruining his aspirations and dreams of pursuing an engineering degree. This unfair treatment against him and other students is not simply an isolated scenario; it is reflective of a growing trend where institutions disregard the diverse beliefs and practices of students in favour of maintaining uniformity, even when that uniformity comes at the expense of individual dignity.
The grim irony here is that while these students were preparing for their examinations, dedicating countless hours to their studies, the system failed to understand that their Janivara is a part of their identity—not a hindrance to it. Moreover, the arbitrary application of rules and regulations seems to vary even within the same examination period, as illustrated by how students wearing Janivara were permitted in during one exam yet barred in another. It highlights confusion and lack of coherence among examining authorities on how to handle religious symbols. The inconsistency is unacceptable and illustrates a deeper failure in understanding the necessity of cultural sensitivity in academic settings.
The All Karnataka Brahmin Mahasabha and other organisations have demanded an investigation by the District Magistrate. It is crucial that swift actions are taken against those who lack respect and understanding of fundamental human rights and religious practices. These officials should be reminded of the sacred trust placed upon them to uphold the very values of diversity and inclusivity that our educational systems stand for. Failures of this nature should serve as a wake-up call to all stakeholders involved in education—from policymakers to educators—to ensure that no student ever feels their identity is compromised or their rights infringed upon in the course of their education.
Comments