A few months ago, Mamata Banerjee’s government took a significant step with the introduction of the Ratri Sathi policy in response to the horrific rape and murder of a lady doctor at RG Kar Medical College & Hospital. This initiative, aimed at restricting women from working late at night, was seen as an implicit acknowledgement of the administration’s failure to protect women in the state. Fast forward to today, and the government has made a striking U-turn, amending excise laws to allow women to work as barmaids in bars, pubs, and dance clubs. The rationale? Promoting gender equality. But has the situation really improved for women, or is this just another political move to mask deeper systemic issues?
A Policy Turnaround: From restrictions to encouragement
The introduction of the Ratri Sathi policy was seen as an attempt to address the growing concern about women’s safety in Bengal, especially following the tragic death of the young doctor. By restricting women from working late at night, Mamata Banerjee’s administration seemed to acknowledge the grim reality of unsafe working environments for women. However, just a few months later, in a complete about-face, the same government has amended excise laws to permit women to work as barmaids in bars and pubs—a decision that directly contradicts the earlier policy of restricting women’s night shifts.
Under the guise of promoting equality, the government’s new law ostensibly provides women with greater employment opportunities in nightlife and entertainment sectors. But the reality behind this seemingly progressive move raises several important questions: Does the government truly care about empowering women, or is it simply an attempt to push women into jobs where safety concerns are already a significant issue?
Safety concerns in Nightlife
The fundamental question that Mamata Banerjee’s administration must address is whether adequate safety measures have been put in place to protect women working in bars, clubs, and dance floors. Many of these establishments operate in a largely unregulated environment, and many are not even properly licensed, leaving workers vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. Women working in such settings are often exposed to a range of risks, from harassment and assault to exploitation by employers. Has Mamata Banerjee considered the implications of sending women into such environments without ensuring their safety? The lack of a comprehensive safety plan and proper regulation leaves women in the lurch, and this glaring oversight suggests that the policy is more about optics than actual empowerment.
The disastrous legacy of ‘Double Double’ jobs
Mamata Banerjee’s administration had promised to provide “double double” jobs for the people of Bengal, but the reality has been far from what was promised. The lack of concrete job creation, combined with the state’s rising unemployment rate, has left many desperate for employment, and vulnerable to exploitation. By pushing women into the questionable employment of barmaids, the government risks further marginalising them.
Lawlessness and Lack of Accountability
The recent changes in excise laws, along with the administration’s overall handling of women’s safety issues, also point to a broader issue: lawlessness in the state. Under Mamata Banerjee’s rule, crimes against women have been on the rise, with many cases going unpunished or swept under the rug.
Comments