The much-propagated narrative of Jawaharlal Nehru’s unwavering stance on Jammu & Kashmir has been shattered by recently declassified American diplomatic telegrams. These documents expose a clandestine attempt by the Nehru government to hand over significant portions of Jammu & Kashmir to Pakistan—a deal never discussed in the Lok Sabha, hidden from the very citizens it would have betrayed.
In the third round of talks held in Karachi on February 9, 1963, India’s then-Minister of External Affairs, Swaran Singh, presented a proposal dubbed the “Line of Peace and Collaboration” (LOPC). This proposal, far from being a gesture of peace, was an outright capitulation. India, under Nehru’s leadership, was prepared to cede strategically significant territories to Pakistan, including the Poonch salient, the Uri sector, and the entire Neelam/Kishanganga Valley. These regions were not just barren lands but critical for both the defence and the livelihoods of countless Indians.
The Shocking Proposal: India’s offer to Pakistan
According to the declassified documents, the LOPC proposed the following territorial adjustments
1. Poonch Salient and Uri: India offered to straighten out the ceasefire line by surrendering the Poonch salient and the Uri sector—both areas of historical and strategic importance. These regions had witnessed fierce battles during the 1947-48 war, where Indian soldiers laid down their lives to protect the motherland.
2. Neelam/Kishanganga Valley: The proposal also included giving up the entire Neelam Valley, known as the Kishanganga Valley in India. This region, extending north of Uri and running parallel to the Line of Control (LoC), is not only strategically vital but also rich in natural resources and home to several Indian villages.
3. Gurez Sector: India proposed to withdraw from the Gurez sector, a key area north of the Kashmir Valley. The Gurez region controls access to the critical routes leading into the heart of Kashmir.
In return, India sought control of the posts dominating Kargil town—positions that India eventually captured during the wars of 1965 and 1971 and now proudly holds.
Bhutto’s Rejection: The unintended savior
Ironically, the person who thwarted this disastrous deal was none other than Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Pakistan’s then-Foreign Minister. Bhutto outrightly rejected the Indian proposal, terming it unacceptable because it did not include the entire Kashmir Valley and territory up to the Chenab River in the Jammu division. His objections were clear and uncompromising. Bhutto criticized the proposal for lacking any provision for the principle of self-determination, which Pakistan consistently advocated for Kashmiris. He expressed dissatisfaction regarding the Chenab River basin, an area Pakistan considered crucial for its water security. Furthermore, he objected to the absence of any mention of the Kashmir Valley, which Pakistan viewed as the core of the dispute. Bhutto also pointed out the lack of clarity regarding the status of the Ladakh region, further solidifying his rejection of the Indian offer.
Secret Diplomacy: The people kept in the dark
The most alarming aspect of this revelation is the secrecy surrounding the talks. The Indian Parliament and the people were kept entirely unaware of Nehru’s willingness to barter away the land for which Indian soldiers had fought and died. The declassified telegrams reveal that both sides agreed to keep the proposals “super-secret,” with Bhutto explicitly warning of “serious consequences in Pakistan” if the details were leaked.
The US diplomatic cable, sent by the American envoy stationed in Karachi, underscores the gravity of the situation. It mentions how Swaran Singh presented the LOPC as a “line of peace and collaboration,” claiming that it adhered to ethnic, linguistic, and economic considerations. However, the reality was starkly different—this was not collaboration but capitulation.
Nehru’s Legacy: A nation almost betrayed
The revelation of this secret deal casts a long shadow over Nehru’s legacy. While his admirers portray him as a stalwart defender of Kashmir’s Indian identity, the facts now suggest otherwise. Nehru’s government was ready to relinquish not just barren hills but thriving regions, fertile valleys, and strategically crucial areas to Pakistan—all without public debate or parliamentary approval.
Had Bhutto accepted the deal, today’s map of India would have looked drastically different, with the enemy’s reach extending dangerously close to the Kashmir Valley and cutting off India’s strategic depth. The sacrifices of our brave soldiers during the wars of 1965, 1971, and even Kargil in 1999 would have been in vain.
A Lesson for Today: Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom
The exposure of this secret negotiation underscores the need for eternal vigilance in matters of national security. The current government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has taken a firm stance on Kashmir, ensuring that no inch of Indian territory is compromised. The abrogation of Article 370 was a bold step towards integrating Jammu & Kashmir fully with the rest of India—a stark contrast to Nehru’s appeasement-driven diplomacy.
As Bharat strides forward under the motto of “Ek Bharat, Shreshtha Bharat,” it is crucial to remember the lessons of history. We must remain vigilant, question the narratives fed to us, and ensure that national interest always reigns supreme. The land of Kashmir, sanctified by the blood of countless patriots, is not a bargaining chip—it is an integral part of Bharat, today and forever.
The declassified documents are not just papers—they are a wake-up call. They remind us of how close we came to losing what is rightfully ours and how strong leadership, rooted in national pride, is the only bulwark against betrayal.
Comments