The recent investigations by the Income Tax (IT) Department have exposed serious discrepancies in the activities and funding patterns of several prominent NGOs, shedding light on their links with foreign entities and anti-national activities. These revelations raise questions about the roles these organisations play under the guise of charitable causes. This is not just an issue of financial mismanagement or regulatory violations —this is a matter of national security and sovereignty.
The recent revelations surrounding several prominent NGOs and their violation of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) have brought to light the extent to which foreign funds have been used to pursue anti-national activities. While civil society plays a crucial role in democracies, this case underscores the importance of scrutinising foreign funding patterns to ensure that they are not being misused to compromise national interests.
One of the most troubling findings from the investigation into the NGOs is the extent to which they have promoted political or religious agendas, rather than serving the broader public interest as their charitable status requires. This promotion of sectarian interests, often through foreign funding, has raised concerns about the role these organisations play in deepening social and political divisions within India.
The accusation here is not just about mismanagement of funds but about using foreign contributions to advance specific political or religious ideologies.
Aligning with Religious Communities
Several NGOs under investigation have been accused of supporting religious or caste-based causes to further political objectives. For example, some organisations have channelled foreign funds into initiatives aimed at promoting the interests of certain minority communities, especially during times of political tension or election cycles. While advocating for minority rights is not inherently problematic, when such activities are funded by foreign entities with vested interests, they can inflame communal tensions rather than foster genuine development or reconciliation.
For instance, Oxfam India has been accused of selectively promoting religious or ethnic narratives in some regions, particularly in areas with a history of communal tension, such as parts of Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat. These campaigns, funded by foreign donors, allegedly aimed to influence political outcomes by mobilising voters on the basis of religious identity rather than encouraging broader social harmony. This type of sectarian mobilisation, when backed by foreign interests, risks exacerbating existing divides within Indian society and undermining the nation’s democratic and secular framework.
Political Lobbying in the Name of Social Justice
Some NGOs have also been accused of using foreign funds to lobby for specific political outcomes under the guise of social justice or environmental activism. For example, the Environics Trust (ET) and LIFE were found to be collaborating with foreign environmental foundations like the European Climate Foundation (ECF) to mobilise protests and litigations against coal and energy projects in India. While these activities were framed as environmental protection efforts, the real motive behind some of these campaigns appeared to be the promotion of a political agenda that sought to weaken India’s industrial and energy sectors, which are vital to its economic growth.
Additionally, LIFE, which received substantial foreign funding, was accused of selectively targeting projects that were seen as politically contentious, particularly those linked to larger corporate groups like Adani. While environmental advocacy is critical, the selective nature of the campaigns, often directed at high-profile companies with significant political and economic clout, suggests a politically motivated agenda rather than an impartial effort to address environmental concerns across the board.
Amplifying Caste-Based Agendas
In some instances, NGOs have been accused of using foreign funds to promote caste-based agendas, which have led to social unrest. For example, there have been reports that certain NGOs funded by foreign donors have played a role in organising protests and movements that are ostensibly about caste justice but have, in reality, been used to push specific political narratives that further divide communities. These movements are sometimes positioned to challenge the legitimacy of democratic institutions, such as local governments, in ways that foster instability rather than progress.
In the case of Survival International, an international NGO that collaborates with Indian NGOs, it was accused of advocating for the rights of specific tribal groups in Jharkhand while opposing industrial projects that could have benefited the broader community. By focusing narrowly on the concerns of one group at the expense of others, these NGOs can inadvertently deepen caste or ethnic divisions, further alienating these groups from national development programmes. While these causes are often presented as “protection of tribal rights,” they are sometimes aligned with foreign geopolitical strategies to halt industrial development in key sectors.
Foreign-Funded Political Campaigns
Foreign funds have also reportedly been used by some NGOs to influence elections or political movements within India. For example, in parts of West Bengal and Kerala, certain foreign-funded NGOs were found to be supporting specific political parties or candidates by funding social programs that were closely aligned with political promises made by those parties. By offering services like healthcare or education to specific communities during election periods, these NGOs were effectively providing a form of indirect electioneering, often favoring parties that represented religious or caste-based interests.
This form of political activism, when backed by foreign money, is a direct violation of FCRA rules, which prohibit the use of foreign contributions for political purposes. However, it is difficult to trace such activities because they are often masked under social or charitable programs. Nevertheless, the investigation into these NGOs revealed patterns where foreign-funded social programmes coincided suspiciously with political campaigns, especially in regions with a history of political instability.
Dividing Communities for Foreign Agendas
Perhaps the most concerning aspect of this foreign funding is the way it has been used to pit communities against each other for the benefit of foreign interests. In several cases, NGOs funded by international organisations were found to be promoting narratives that aligned more with the strategic interests of foreign countries than with India’s national interests. For instance, foreign-funded NGOs have often been linked to campaigns that portray certain religious or ethnic groups as oppressed, while vilifying others, creating unnecessary tensions.
For example, in the case of the Josh and Aman Biradari Trust, which allegedly received funds from Oxfam India, these organisations were accused of promoting communal narratives that aggravated tensions between religious communities. By emphasising religious identities over national unity, these organisations contributed to a divisive atmosphere that served to weaken India’s internal cohesion while furthering foreign strategic goals in the region.
NGO Nexus and Foreign Funding
The financial breakdown of these NGOs further underscores the foreign hand at play. Between 2015 and 2021, foreign contributions formed the vast majority of their total funding. According to reports:
- Care India received 92 per cent of its total funding from foreign sources
- Environics Trust received a staggering 95 per cent of its funding from abroad
- LIFE’s foreign funding stood at 86 per cent
- Oxfam India was funded 78 per cent by foreign entities
- CISSD received 100 per cent of its funding from overseas
These figures suggest that these NGOs were heavily reliant on foreign contributions, raising concerns about their accountability and motivations. While it is not illegal to receive foreign funds, using such funds to obstruct national progress, conspire with foreign entities against domestic businesses, or interfere in the country’s sovereign policies is a blatant violation of national law.
Implications of Promoting Political Agendas
The promotion of political or religious agendas through foreign funding raises significant concerns for India’s internal stability and sovereignty. By aligning with specific groups or causes, these NGOs not only violate the FCRA but also risk deepening social and political divides within the country. The selective advocacy for certain communities, often at the expense of others, undermines the broader goal of inclusive development and national unity.
Furthermore, involvement of foreign players in these sectarian activities raises serious questions about the motives behind such funding. It suggests that external forces are using NGOs as instruments to weaken India’s social fabric and undermine its developmental progress by fostering division. The recent revelations about these NGOs highlight the need for stricter oversight and transparency in how foreign funds are used within India to ensure that they do not contribute to divisive or politically motivated agendas. The investigation into these NGOs has revealed the potential dangers posed by foreign-funded activism that prioritises sectarian or political agendas over national interests. Moving forward, it is crucial that India’s regulatory framework ensures that NGOs operate in accordance with the law and that foreign contributions are used transparently for genuine social and developmental causes. The integrity of India’s civil society must be preserved, and any activities that seek to divide the country along religious or political lines must be thoroughly investigated and addressed.
Comments