Bengaluru: The long-dormant Kempanna Commission report on the Arkavati denotification case has resurfaced, causing a stir in Karnataka’s political landscape. The report, which investigates the alleged illegal denotification of Arkavati Layout land during the tenure of former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, is back in the spotlight after Governor Thawarchand Gehlot formally requested the state government to submit the commission’s report along with related documents. This move escalates the ongoing tensions between the Raj Bhavan and the state government, pushing the issue into a new phase of political conflict.
The Kempanna Commission was originally tasked with investigating the alleged denotification of 540 acres of Arkavati Layout land during Siddaramaiah’s tenure as Chief Minister between 2013 and 2018. The Governor’s recent request for the report comes at a crucial time, as the High Court is currently hearing a writ petition filed by Siddaramaiah, which challenges the Governor’s permission for a separate investigation concerning land allotments by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA). The Governor’s decision to seek the Kempanna Commission report has added fuel to the ongoing debate and political wrangling between the state government and Raj Bhavan.
The letter from Governor Gehlot, addressed to Karnataka’s Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh, prompted the Urban Development Department to take action. On September 11, the department handed over the file containing the report to Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar. Under Secretary Rajesh S. Sulikeri presented the file, which contains crucial details regarding the denotification case. The submission of the report has sparked significant interest in Karnataka’s political circles, with many now speculating about how DCM Shivakumar and the state government will handle the sensitive findings.
This development comes on the heels of a prior request by BJP leader and Member of the Legislative Council (MLC) CT Ravi, who had written to the Chief Minister urging the government to make the Kempanna Commission report public. The report is expected to provide critical insights into the denotification of nearly 983 acres of land, a process that spanned from 2004 to 2014. Key questions remain about whether proper legal procedures were followed during the land acquisition by the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) and whether any illegalities occurred during the denotification process.
The Arkavati land denotification controversy has been simmering for nearly a decade. Jagadish Shettar, the Leader of the Opposition at the time, had accused Siddaramaiah of unlawfully denotifying land intended for the Arkavati Layout development project in Bengaluru. In response to the allegations, Siddaramaiah’s government formed the Kempanna Commission in August 2014 to thoroughly investigate the matter. The commission’s findings were compiled into a 1,861-page report, which was submitted to the then Chief Secretary Subhash Chandra Kunthia in August 2017. However, the report was never made public, nor was it tabled in the Legislature. Successive governments—led by HD Kumaraswamy, BS Yediyurappa, and Basavaraj Bommai—chose not to disclose the findings.
Throughout this period, Siddaramaiah has maintained his innocence, repeatedly asserting that the Kempanna Commission exonerated him from any wrongdoing. Despite these claims, the issue has remained a political hot potato. During Bommai’s tenure as Chief Minister, the BJP raised several corruption allegations against the Congress, including the infamous “40 per cent commission” charge. Bommai had threatened to expose the Arkavati scam and take legal action, but no concrete measures were ever taken.
The recent revival of the Kempanna Commission report following the Governor’s request has placed the issue back at the forefront of Karnataka’s political discourse. Political observers and leaders alike are now watching closely to see whether the report will finally be made public, and if its findings could have any significant impact on Siddaramaiah’s political career and the broader political climate in the state.
The Arkavati denotification case continues to be a thorny issue that cuts across party lines. The state’s political establishment is abuzz with speculation about the next steps, with many questioning whether further investigations or actions will be taken against those implicated in the case. For now, all eyes remain on DCM D.K. Shivakumar and how the state government plans to handle the Kempanna Commission report as the pressure mounts for greater transparency and accountability.
The state’s political scene is rife with speculation, and the outcome of this renewed focus on the Arkavati denotification case could have far-reaching consequences in Karnataka’s politics. Whether the Kempanna Commission report will finally be disclosed and whether it will lead to any legal or political fallout remains to be seen.
Comments