The political transformation of the United States, with a particular focus on the evolution of the Democratic Party, is a topic of profound historical significance. Originating in the early 19th century under Andrew Jackson’s leadership, the party initially championed the ‘common man’ against the elites. However, this narrative has dramatically shifted over time. The party has transitioned into its current ‘progressive’ state, a movement increasingly influenced by elites who exploit societal flaws to maintain power and influence.
Evolution of Democratic Party
The Democratic Party’s early years were marked by a populist spirit, advocating for the rights of ordinary Americans. However, a significant shift occurred during the 20th century. The New Deal era of the 1930s, spearheaded by Franklin D Roosevelt, focused on economic regulation and social welfare, fostering the American middle class. Yet, as time passed, particularly in the 1970s under Jimmy Carter, the party increasingly embraced neoliberal principles, paving the way for a new form of elitism. This modern elitism, embodied in the ‘progressive’ movement, reflects a strategic move by the elites to maintain dominance by co-opting the language of social justice, rebranding their power as a moral crusade while subtly entrenching economic and social disparities.
The focus on identity politics, categorising individuals by race, gender and sexual orientation, serves as another tool for elites to maintain control. By emphasising differences rather than commonalities, Democratic Party has deepened societal divisions
Today’s Democratic Party, particularly its progressive wing, is associated with “wokeness” and social justice ideals, driven largely by the party’s elite class. This shift has been used to manipulate vital societal issues to their advantage.
Erosion of Free Speech
The rise of “cancel culture” within the Democratic Party exemplifies how elites have used progressive ideals to stifle dissent and consolidate power. Under the guise of combating misinformation, platforms like Facebook have censored content challenging elite narratives. A recent example is the controversy surrounding Facebook’s censorship practices. Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta (formerly Facebook), publicly apologised for the platform’s misdeeds, including its role in censoring Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. This censorship was justified under the guise of combating misinformation, but it later emerged that the story was credible, raising concerns about the suppression of information that could influence public opinion. This departure from the party’s traditional liberal values of free speech has created an atmosphere of fear and conformity, where only approved viewpoints are tolerated. The hypocrisy lies in the party’s simultaneous suppression of the freedoms foundational to democracy.
Fragmentation of Society
The focus on identity politics, categorising individuals by race, gender and sexual orientation, serves as another tool for elites to maintain control. By emphasising differences rather than commonalities, Democratic Party has deepened societal divisions. This strategy distracts from broader economic and social issues, allowing the powerful to maintain the status quo while appearing to champion the oppressed. For instance, the debate over Critical Race Theory (CRT) in schools has sparked intense controversy, leading to community divisions. While proponents argue that CRT addresses systemic racism, opponents see it as a divisive tool that emphasises racial differences at the expense of unity and shared values. Critics say that CRT portrays America as fundamentally racist and can make white people feel guilty or ashamed. This perception can create tension and division among racial groups.
Hypocrisy of Foreign Policy
The Democrats’ approach to foreign policy reveals a stark hypocrisy. While claiming to promote democracy abroad, their interventions often lead to disastrous outcomes. For example, the Obama administration’s involvement in Libya, framed as a mission to protect democracy, resulted in chaos and human suffering, ultimately serving elite interests in expanding markets or securing geopolitical dominance. Similarly, for the Biden administration, while withdrawing from Afghanistan, were the rights of Afghani women lesser than Western women? Was democracy not crucial for Afghan society?
Progressive Elitism’s Impact on Society
The shift towards progressivism within the Democratic Party is primarily driven by elites who have co-opted the language of social justice to maintain their power. By focusing on divisive issues such as identity politics and cancel culture they divert attention from the more profound economic and structural inequalities that persist in American society. This elite-driven progressivism has led to a paradox where the party, once a champion of the common man, now often serves the interests of the few. This strategy deepens social fragmentation and undermines the core democratic principles of equality and justice.
Republican Reaction: Resisting Change
In response to the Democrats’ progressive shift, the Republican Party has increasingly embraced a reactionary stance, seeking to preserve traditional values. This opposition has often taken on a populist and nationalist tone, further polarising the American political landscape.
Threat to Democratic Institutions
The rise of nationalist rhetoric within the Republican Party, particularly during the Trump administration, represents a significant departure from the party’s earlier commitment to free markets and global engagement. The “America First” agenda, which prioritises US’s national interests at the expense of international cooperation, exemplifies this shift. The January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol is a stark example of how nationalist rhetoric can undermine democratic institutions.
Economic Policies & Growing Inequality
Republicans continued advocacy for deregulation and tax cuts, particularly those benefiting the wealthy, has exacerbated economic inequality. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which significantly reduced corporate tax rates, primarily benefited the wealthy, widening the gap between rich and poor. As the middle class shrinks and economic disparities grow, the social contract that underpins democracy is increasingly strained.
Resistance to Social Progress
Republicans resistance to social progress reflects a broader reluctance to adapt to changing societal norms. This resistance is rooted in a desire to preserve traditional values, but it often alienates large segments of the population, contributing to the polarisation and fragmentation of society.
The Democrats’ embrace of wokeness and identity politics has fragmented society and stifled free speech, while the Republicans’ reactionary stance has fuelled division. The neoliberal era, starting from the 1970s, set the stage for this disintegration by weakening the sense of collective responsibility that characterised the New Deal order of the 1930s. As each party becomes more extreme, the political centre—a key feature of a stable democracy—continues to erode.
The consequences of this disintegration are already visible. Economic inequality is growing, social cohesion is weakening, and trust in democratic institutions is declining. As wokeness continues to pull the country apart, the challenges facing American democracy become ever more daunting.
One wonders if America will ever find a way to balance the demands for social justice with the need for social cohesion, economic growth with economic fairness, and individual rights with collective responsibility. The current trajectory of American politics threatens the very foundations of democracy, making it imperative for both parties to reassess their paths and work towards a more united and equitable society.
Leave a Comment