A controversial decision by officials at the Kacchasabeswarar temple in Kanchipuram has sparked outrage among devotees. Temple authorities allegedly ordered the felling of a ‘Sthala Viruksham’ (sacred tree) on the temple grounds to be used as firewood for a yajna (fire ritual).
This act has angered devotees who view the sacred tree as an integral part of the temple’s spiritual ecosystem. They accuse the Human Resources (HR) and Chief Engineer (CE) officials of disrespecting age-old agama rules and Hindu traditions.
Kancheepuram’s historic Kacchasabeswarar temple, dating back 1,600 years, is now at the center of controversy as officials from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR and CE) department face criticism for allegedly violating agama rules. Renovation efforts preceding the consecration event, yet to be scheduled, took a controversial turn when officials ordered the felling of ancient Sthala Virukshams (sacred trees) to be used as firewood for a yagnam (sacred ritual).
The temple, renowned for its unique elements like the Nagalinga tree, Sarakondrai, Vanni tree, Mango, and a conjoined Neem and Peepal tree, holds immense significance for devotees who consider these trees as deities. However, temple officials, particularly the Executive Officer (EO) Natarajan, deemed these trees hindrances to the ongoing renovation work.
It is alleged that EO Natarajan ordered the felling of these sacred trees, justifying the action by claiming it was necessary for the renovation and that only dead branches were being pruned. Devotees, however, expressed their anguish, questioning the necessity of cutting down centuries-old trees and emphasising their sanctity.
Athisayam P Kumar, the BJP Kancheepuram district religious and temple development wing president, along with others, petitioned the district collector, bringing attention to the EO’s actions. Kumar criticised the use of power axe saw machines for cutting the trees, emphasising that leaving a half-foot level above the ground violated agama rules.
Devotees questioned the need to fell Sthala Virukshams when the temple’s renovation budget ran into crores. They urged transparency in the HR and CE department’s income and expenditure to prevent embezzlement and irregularities. Kumar accused the HR and CE department of violating the Archaeological Act and avoiding proper rules and systems for renovation works.
Demanding departmental and criminal actions against the EO and those involved in felling the sacred trees, the BJP leader underscored the emotional distress caused to devotees. Social and environmental activists joined the plea, urging the government to prevent such incidents in HR and CE-administered temples in the future.
Critics argue that the HR and CE’s actions reveal a pattern of disregard for temple traditions and devotees’ sentiments. Alleged incidents of agama violations, revenue-focused initiatives, alienation of temple properties, and fee hikes have fueled concerns about the department’s priorities.
Athisayam B Kumar and Hindu Munnani Parameswaran expressed dissatisfaction with the HR and CE’s approach, accusing it of discouraging devotees through actions that align with non-Hindu beliefs. They pointed out fee increases at temples like Tiruchendur and Thiruvannamalai, making temple visits financially burdensome for many devotees.
The controversy surrounding the ancient Kacchasabeswarar temple highlights broader concerns about the preservation of sacred traditions, environmental sustainability, and transparency in the management of temple affairs. Devotees and activists remain vigilant, calling for accountability and a reevaluation of the HR and CE’s approach to temple administration.
The ongoing debate underscores the delicate balance between preservation, renovation, and adherence to sacred traditions in India’s ancient temples, where spirituality, culture, and environmental consciousness intersect.
Comments