Representative image of bursting of firecrackers
The Supreme Court’s recent clarification on November 7 emphasised that the ban on the use of barium and other prohibited chemicals in firecrackers extends nationwide, beyond just the National Capital Region. Despite this, the DMK government has taken additional steps to ensure compliance with the apex court’s orders by forming a dedicated “special force” within the Greater Chennai Police.
Deepawali, traditionally associated with the joyous sounds of firecrackers, now faces strict regulations. The government has imposed specific timing restrictions, allowing the bursting of crackers only for two hours between 6 AM and 7 AM and between 7 PM and 8 PM on November 12, 2023. An advisory from the Greater Chennai Police highlights that only green crackers made with environmentally friendly and permitted chemicals will be allowed for sale and use.
The move has sparked controversy, with critics accusing the DMK government of selective secularism and an apparent bias against Hindu traditions. Despite Hindus expressing discontent over Stalin’s failure to extend festival greetings to their community, the government remains steadfast in its commitment to combating pollution.
In recent years, environmental activists and NGOs advocating for green initiatives have targeted Deepawali, calling for a blanket ban on firecrackers. However, critics argue that these individuals often turn a blind eye to other significant sources of pollution, such as vehicle emissions and mass animal slaughter during festivals like Ramzan or Bakrid.
The government’s crackdown on Deepawali firecracker violations comes amidst a global shift towards eco-friendly practises. Manufacturers in Sivakasi, recognised as the fireworks hub of India, have adapted to the changing landscape by transitioning to the production of green crackers, eliminating barium chloride and other banned chemicals.
While the DMK government emphasises the need for environmental consciousness, critics accuse them of failing to address pollution issues arising from other religious practises. The government’s decision to target Deepawali specifically has ignited debates on the alleged selective aversion towards Hindu customs and traditions.
As the nation navigates these complexities, it remains to be seen how the public will respond to the enforcement of these stringent measures and whether they will have a lasting impact on reducing air pollution during festive seasons. The clash between cultural traditions, environmental concerns, and government policies continues to unfold, shaping the narrative surrounding the celebration of Deepavali in the Dravidian Model state.
In various locations across Chennai, heated arguments have erupted between police personnel and the public as law enforcement officers strive to enforce the Tamil Nadu police’s prohibition on bursting fireworks and crackers in public places during Diwali. The move is in compliance with a Supreme Court order, emphasising the need to adhere to permissible noise levels set by the Pollution Control Board (PCB) between 8 pm and 10 pm.
To ensure strict implementation of the regulations, a “special force” has been established in 102 police stations across Chennai. Comprising two constables led by sub-inspectors, the special force is tasked with arresting individuals who burst firecrackers with a sound exceeding 125 decibels and those who violate the designated time restrictions. Non-compliance with these orders is met with the prospect of prosecution.
The initiative has sparked criticism on social media, with many expressing their discontent and labelling the move as ludicrous. Sanghi Prince, a BJP Tamil Nadu social media functionary who had been previously arrested by the DMK for his social media posts, took to Twitter to voice his opposition. He wrote, “A special force has been formed to catch all ‘them.’ Terrorists? Drug peddlers? Illicit liquor salesmen? No, those who burst crackers after the stipulated time.”
The move to control Deepwali festivities has become a focal point of debate, with critics questioning the priorities of the DMK government and its approach to crime reduction in the city.
As the enforcement continues, the public’s response, along with the government’s ability to strike a balance between cultural traditions and environmental concerns, remains to be seen. The clash of opinions on social media reflects the broader discourse surrounding the contentious issue of regulating festive celebrations in the city.
Social media has become a platform for criticism against the DMK-led government in Tamil Nadu, with activists expressing discontent over the establishment of a “special force” to enforce regulations on bursting firecrackers during Diwali. Amidst escalating tensions between police personnel and the public, voices on social media are highlighting what they perceive as misplaced priorities by the government.
One social media activist, in a scathing post, drew attention to the government’s focus on curbing Diwali celebrations rather than addressing more pressing issues such as petrol bombings, car bomb blasts (referring to the Coimbatore Jamesa Mubin terror attack), murders, and caste-based atrocities. The post questioned the rationale behind forming a specialised force to tackle firecracker violations while more serious crimes persist.
The activist criticised the government’s apparent disconnect from practical considerations, stating that expecting people to adhere to specific time slots for celebration, akin to a military regime, is impractical. The post highlighted the difficulty of aligning festive celebrations with government directives, emphasising the role of personal choice in observing traditions.
Comparisons were drawn between the government’s approach and historical instances, such as the Jizyah tax imposed by Muslim kings, raising concerns about potential infringements on individual freedoms. The post also touched upon the government’s history of imposing restrictions on Hindu festivals, including processions on Vinayagar Chathurthi and immersion processions, as well as denying route march approvals to the RSS. Allegations of bias were levelled, claiming that such restrictions were not applied uniformly to minorities and DMK allies.
Critics argue that these decisions could lead to further discontent among the Hindu community and prompt them to form a vote bank of their own. The sentiment expressed on social media reflects a broader debate on the government’s approach to cultural practises and the perceived imbalance in its regulatory actions.
As the controversy unfolds, the DMK government finds itself at the centre of a heated public discourse, raising questions about its governance priorities and the potential implications of its decisions on community relations in Tamil Nadu.
Leave a Comment