In a shocking move, the Allahabad High Court on September 6 granted bail to two accused booked under the Uttar Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act. The court, while granting the bail, observed that distributing the Bible, organising Bhandara, and telling people good things about other religions does not amount to allurement for conversion. The judgment also barred people other than blood relatives of the victim from lodging complaints against organisers of such prayer meetings and conversion gatherings.
A single judge bench of Justice Shamim Ahmad at the Uttar Pradesh High Court’s Lucknow bench passed the order (number–58585) on September 6 granting bail to two accused identified as Jose Pappochen and Sheeja. They both were booked under the UP Freedom of Religion Act and the Prevention of Atrocities Act for luring Dalits to conversion.
Earlier, a special judge’s SC/ST Act, on March 3, 2023, dismissed the bail application (number–178/2023) as they were booked under the stringent SC-ST as well as the UP Anti Conversion Law. After the bail application was dismissed in the lower court, the applicants moved to the Allahabad High Court.
What says the FIR registered against the culprits?
Organiser accessed the copy of the FIR (number–31/2023) registered at the Jalalpur police station of the Ambedkar Nagar district of Uttar Pradesh on January 24, 2023.
The complainant, who happens to be the Zila Mantri of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Ambedkar Nagar, registered this FIR on behalf of a number of people who converted to Christianity under the influence of the accused.
In his complaint, Chandrika Prasad told the police that the accused, Jose Pappochen and Sheeja have been luring people from the Scheduled Caste community to Chritianty with multiple allurements. They have been doing this for a long time in that area and must be apprehended, as the members of the SC community are annoyed with the repeated attempts of conversion.
After this complaint, the accused were arrested and booked under sections 3 and 5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act and section 3(1)(IV) of the SC-ST Act.
What Prasad told Organiser?
This correspondent called Chandrika Prasad on September 9 and he said, as he comes from a political background he meets multiple people. He had been receiving complaints that hundreds of people had converted to Christianity under the influence of prayer meetings and gatherings in the Shahpur-Firozpur area. All those converted include people from the scheduled caste communities.
Notably, Prasad is himself a Dalit.
He found that the people associated with the Church were distributing the Bible among the Dalits and that many of the locals had converted under their influence. Now these families are not ready to come up. (He did agreed to arrange a call with Organiser of the locals if any of them is ready to speak).
He added, the exact number of convertees is not mentioned in the FIR but many have converted in the region. Now that the court has barred people like us from registering complaints in these cases, this will only facilitate the missionary mafia, he added.
He said the residents where the conversion was going on in the region mostly house people from the Lona Jati who are considered mahadalits.
What says the court order?
During the arguments, the counsel for the appellants, Vishwa Nath Pratap Singh presented before the court that the accused have been falsely framed due to political rivalry and that they had nothing to do with the conversion of the locals.
The counsel referred to the sections of the UP Anti Conversion Law while justifying his arguments and said, Section 3 of the Act, 2021, which provides a prohibition of conversion from one religion to another religion by misrepresentation, force, fraud, undue influence, coercion, and allurement, clearly specifying that conversion on the aforesaid grounds from one religion to another religion is prohibited.
He added, the accused have been falsely framed that they lured people by providing free treatment to the locals in order to get them converted.
The counsel also referred to section 4 of the law which says, “ Person competent to lodge First Information Report-Any aggrieved person, his/her parents, brother, sister, or any other person who is related to him/her by blood, marriage or adoption may lodge a First Information Report of such conversion which contravenes the provisions of Section 3, mentioned in the act”.
The counsel said in front of the bench that the complainant in this case, who is a Zila mantri of the ruling party has no authority to register a complaint against the people, even if they are involved in the conversion.
Readers must know that the accused were also booked under section 5(1) of the act which says, whoever contravenes the provisions of section 3 shall without prejudice to any civil liability, be punished with imprisonment for a term, which shall not be less than one year but extend to five years with liable to fine no less than Rs 50,000.
The counsel referred to the statements of the villagers recorded under section 161 of the CrPC where they have told the court how the accused in this case used to give them good teachings, distributing Holy Bible books, encouraging children to get education, organise assembly of villagers and performing “Bhandara” and instructing the villagers not to enter into altercation and also not to take liquor, which does not account to allurement.
The opposition counsel presented the side of the complainant on behalf of the government, saying, that the accused were alluring people to Christianity using soft measures.
The court, however, believed that the appellants were involved in providing good teachings to children and promoting the spirit of brotherhood among the villagers. But there does not appear to be any material as to show that appellants had used any undue influence or allurement to the said villagers for mass conversion. It said, there is no matter available which would suggest conversion by use of force.
The court also observed that the FIR was not lodged by a competent person in this case, as mentioned in section 4 of the act. It is also believed that the appellants have been falsely implicated in this case under the charges.
The order says, “complainant has no locus to lodge the present F.I.R. as provided under Section 4 of the Act, 2021 and there also appears force in the argument of learned counsel for the appellants that providing good teachings, distributing Holy Bible books, encouraging children to get education, organizing assembly of villagers and performing “Bhandara” and instructing the villagers not to enter into altercations and also not to take liquor do not amount to allurement.”
Accordingly, the court directed that the accused be released on bail.
Cases in Uttar Pradesh where Missionaries have lured people with jobs, money, houses and others
Uttar Pradesh’s Kanpur is becoming a hub of missionary conversion, over the past few months as many as seven cases have been reported. In all these cases, FIRs (First Information Reports) have been registered and the victims have stated that they were lured to Christianity and Jesus. The victims had a list of things that were promised upon conversion; from lavishing house to cash money, from a better job to medical treatment, the missionary representatives promised everything.
These cases are some among many which have been registered in Uttar Pradesh over the past few years. Readers must note that many of these cases either go unreported or in many instances unchecked. There is no way to track the people involved in these cases as prayer meetings these days take place in one’s house, which the Missionary people call a temporary ‘Church’.
A ruling like this given by the High Court is only going to facilitate the perpetrators. The very law which was made to curb and control illegal conversions in the state seems insufficient to contain the crimes. A case and a judgement like this, calls for amendments in the UP Anti Conversion Law.
Leave a Comment