On September 2, the Tamil Nadu Progressive Writers Association organised the Sanatanam (Sanatan Dharma) Abolition Conclave (Conclave for Destruction of Sanatana Dharma) in Chennai. The conclave was organised to abolish Sanatan Dharma. Almost all the members of the I.N.D.I Alliance were part of this conclave. One of the speaker’s controversial statements is making rounds of the internet.
Before moving into the controversial speech and the speaker, let us take you through the list of speakers invited in this conclave. They were K. Veeramani of Dravidar Kazhagam, Udhayanidhi Stalin a DMK Minister, Radhika Vemula (Mother of Rohit Vemula), Madhukkur Ramalingam a member of the Communist Party of India, T.L. Thirumavalavan from the Liberation Panthers Party, Peter Alphonse from the Congress Party, S. Venkatesan of the Marxist Communist Party and Adhavan Deetchanya of the Tamil Nadu Progressive Writers Association with Ponmudi a DMK Minister.
Stalin’s son compares Sanatan Dharma with Mosquito, Malaria and Dengue
Udhayanidhi Stalin the DMK president and MK Stalin’s son said, ” I thank the organisers for giving me the opportunity to speak at this conference to eradicate Sanatana Dharma. I congratulate the organisers for calling the conference as ‘eradicate Sanatana Dharma’ instead of ‘opposing Sanatana Dharma.’
“There are some things which we have to eradicate and we can’t merely oppose. Mosquitoes, dengue fever, malaria, corona, all these are things which we cannot oppose, we have to eradicate them. Sanatanam is also like this. Eradicating and not opposing Sanatanam should be our first task,”
I.N.Di.A alliance partner organizing conference to finish Sanatana dharma… pic.twitter.com/5tY84luLyq
— Vishwatma 🇮🇳 ( மோடியின் குடும்பம் ) (@HLKodo) September 2, 2023
“What is Sanatanam? The name Sanatanam itself comes from Sanskrit. Sanatan Dharma is opposed to equality and social justice. What is the meaning of Sanatanam? Eternal or something that can’t be changed. Something that can’t be questioned. That is the meaning of Sanatan Dharma,” he further added.
He further added, “Earlier only Ramayana and Mahabharatam were considered as art and literary works of people. Only after the Dravidian Movement and Communist movement, people were told about Thirukkural, Silappadhikaram, Manimekalai, etc.“, he said.
“Sanatanam said to divide people by caste and segregate them. But Our Kalaignar brought every community in one village and gave the name ‘Samathuvapuram’ giving a whip to Sanatanam“, Udhayanidhi Stalin said.
Eradicate Sanatan Dharma Conclave
As per a report by Mediyaan.com, the conference is being led by Aya Vaikunder, Narayana Guru and Iyan Kali. They call themselves Sanatan reformers and work towards the idea of destroying it. They and their anti-Hindu ideas are flourishing under the DMK regime.
Before moving ahead, let us take you through the list of events at the conference:
- Deadly History of Sanatan (Sanatan Dharma)
- Sanatan and Women
- Tamil Norms and Sanatan
- Caste Theory & Conspiracy Theory
- Tamil Music & Sanatan
- Sanatan Imposition & Opposition in Media
- What is the way to oppose Sanatan Dharma Politics or Spirituality
- Weapon to destroy Sanatan Dharma
- Anti-Hindu DMK regime
DMK’s Anti-Hindu attitude
Reports have pointed towards the silence of the ruling DMK over the Sanatan Abolition Conference and the Progressive Writers and Artists Association. Allowing such a conference will only preserve the systematic poisoning of the Sanatan way of life and insult the same majority of people. This conference highlights the blatant anti-Hinduism and prejudice of the ruling party in the state.
Surprisingly, this anti-Sanatan conference was announced by a group of foreign ideological followers with a dark background. This conference confirms the threat situation in Tamil Nadu where there is no security for Sanatan Dharma and the people following its path.
An anti-Sanatan convention that extols the highest human dharma is blatant religious hatred. It is actually the majority of the affected people who should hold a Sanatan awareness conference against all these.
Comments