Srinagar: In a recent incident that has sparked controversy, a teacher in a Jammu and Kashmir school was arrested for allegedly beating a student who had written the religious shloka ‘Jai Shree Ram’ on the blackboard. This incident has brought to light the concerns raised by certain members of the opposition and the ‘you-know-who’ community regarding this sacred chant. ‘Jai Shree Ram’ holds deep religious significance, symbolising obeisance to Bhagwan Ram, a prominent deity in Sanatan Dharma. Bhagwan Ram, an embodiment of virtues such as chivalry, bravery, and purity of heart, is considered a supreme personality of God and a revered avatar of Bhagwan Vishnu. However, a section of the ‘you-know-who’ community has displayed intolerance towards this chant, highlighting a broader pattern of their attitude.
What is the issue, how it started
In a school located in Jammu and Kashmir, a distressing incident unfolded involving a 10-year-old student named Akash. The catalyst for this unfortunate event was the teacher, Ashraf, who reacted strongly when Akash uttered the phrase ‘Jai Shree Ram’. Ashraf called Akash to his desk and inquired about the shloka. Akash explained that he hadn’t realized it was a religious slogan; he had merely copied it down since the teacher had written it.
Ashraf’s anger escalated, accusing Akash of deliberate provocation and subsequently resorting to physically striking him with a stick. The bewildered and frightened Akash fled to the principal’s office. In response, the principal alerted the authorities, resulting in Ashraf’s arrest. Akash’s parents were summoned to the school, and they escorted him home. This alarming incident left Akash deeply shaken, struggling to comprehend why he had become a victim of Ashraf’s aggression. His trepidation regarding returning to school was met with his parents’ insistence that he continue attending. Akash’s ordeal serves as a poignant reminder that the fundamental right to practice one’s religion should be respected. It underscores the imperative for societal tolerance towards diverse beliefs, emphasizing the importance of non-violence as a means of conflict resolution.
This intolerance is rooted in historical contexts, as these individuals historically considered idol-worshippers are referred to as ‘Kafirs.’ Such a belief system has led them to view acts of ‘jihad’ or holy war as a means to fulfill their religious duty. This pattern, exemplified by the incident of the student’s beating, is reflective of their approach when they hold majority control. The intolerance towards the religious chant ‘Jai Shree Ram’ has its roots in history. For centuries, Hindus and Muslims have lived together in India, but there have also been periods of conflict and violence. One of the most notable periods of conflict was the Mughal era, when the Mughal rulers tried to impose Islam on the Hindu majority. This led to a number of uprisings, including the famous Battle of Panipat in 1526.
The conflict between Hindus and Muslims continued in the British colonial period. The British often played the two communities off against each other, and this helped to sow the seeds of mistrust and division. The post-independence period has also seen its share of conflict. The partition of India in 1947 led to widespread violence, and millions of people were displaced. In recent years, there has been a resurgence of religious intolerance in India. This has been fueled by a number of factors, including the rise of Hindu nationalism and the spread of misinformation.
The Dangers of Intolerance
The dangers of intolerance are clear. When people are intolerant of others, it can lead to violence, discrimination, and even genocide. The Holocaust is a stark reminder of the dangers of intolerance. In the 1930s and 1940s, the Nazi regime in Germany systematically murdered millions of Jews. This was made possible by the Nazis’ intolerance of Jews, which they justified on the basis of their racist ideology. The Rwandan genocide is another example of the dangers of intolerance. In 1994, Hutu extremists in Rwanda massacred over 800,000 Tutsis.
This was sparked by the Hutus’ intolerance of the Tutsis, which they justified on the basis of their ethnic differences. The question regarding the intolerance directed towards the religious chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’ prompts contemplation on its underlying causes. Despite being a deeply rooted religious expression rather than a political slogan, this chant has inadvertently garnered political undertones from opposition groups and specific communities. This potential politicisation threatens to dilute the profound spiritual significance that it holds.
This incident stands as a clarion call for adherents of Sanatan Dharma to confront the mounting challenges of intolerance targeting their beliefs. Swift action is imperative to thwart the continuation of an environment conducive to escalating conflicts and societal divisions. As India grapples with its rich tapestry of diverse cultures and religions, the imperative lies in seeking common ground and nurturing mutual respect as cornerstones for fostering harmony.
In summation, the controversy surrounding ‘Jai Shri Ram’ underscores the urgency for an inclusive exchange of ideas and fostering mutual comprehension among the various strata of society. India’s trajectory towards unity in the face of its remarkable diversity hinges upon addressing such contentious matters, serving as a vital prerequisite for societal advancement and cohesion.
Comments