Wikipedia model not completely dependable, cautions Supreme Court
December 5, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Wikipedia model not completely dependable, cautions Supreme Court

The Supreme Court also observed that adjudicating agencies, particularly the Commissioner of Customs (Appeal), relied heavily on internet sources such as Wikipedia to support their judgments

WEBDESKWEBDESK
Jan 19, 2023, 01:10 pm IST
in Bharat
Follow on Google News
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

Online sources such as Wikipedia are based on a crowd-sourced and user-generated editing model and is not totally reliable and can encourage incorrect information, the Supreme Court has said on January 17.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Surya Kant acknowledged the usefulness of platforms that allow open access to knowledge throughout the world but advised against utilising such sources for judicial conflict resolution.

“We say so for the reason that these sources, despite being a treasure trove of knowledge, are based on a crowd-sourced and user-generated editing model that is not completely dependable in terms of academic veracity and can promote misleading information as has been noted by this court on previous occasions also,” the bench said.
The Apex Court stated that courts and adjudicating bodies should make effort to urge counsel to depend on more genuine and reputable sources.

The remarks were made in a decision concerning the proper categorisation of imported ‘All in One Integrated Desktop Computers’ under the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act of 1985.The Supreme Court also observed that adjudicating agencies, particularly the Commissioner of Customs (Appeal), relied heavily on internet sources such as Wikipedia to support their judgments.

The Apex court also noted that Wikipedia is an online mode of encyclopedia and information can be entered therein by any person and as such, it may not be authentic.In 2010, former Supreme Court Justice Markandey Katju referenced to Wikipedia for searching meaning of the word “common law marriage” while delivering a verdict.

Justice Markandey Katju had made information available on Wikipedia the basis for formulating a four-point guideline and ruled that live-in relationships must satisfy it to be categorised as a “relationship” in the nature of marriage under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Notably, Wikipedia is a free, open content online encyclopedia created through the collaborative effort of a community of users known as Wikipedians. Anyone registered on the site can create an article for publication; registration is not required to edit articles.

Interestingly, Wikimedia, which operates Wikipedia on January 18 launched the first major update to its desktop interface in 10 years. The revamped desktop interface comes a time when English Wikipedia is celebrating the completion of its 22nd year.

Topics: Supreme CourtWikipediawikipedia supreme courtonline source wikipediaonline wikipediasupreme court verdict on wikipedia
Share5TweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

“Know about 10-20 accounts of sexual harassment faced by women wrestlers”: Vinesh Phogat

Next News

VHP condemns Telangana Government for State funeral of former Nizam Mukkaram Jah

Related News

The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court allows extra support for overburdened BLOs, says SIR duties are mandatory for government staff

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee

West Bengal: NCBC delists 35 Muslim castes wrongly included in OBC category; Mamata govt’s appeasement politics exposed

Representation image of a Muslim woman (Tribune)

Supreme Court secures property rights of divorced Muslim women in landmark verdict

Supreme Court tears into Rohingya plea, says ‘Illegal entrants cannot claim rights meant for Indian citizens’

Supreme Court questions extending rights to illegal Rohingya entrants amid rising security fears

Supreme Court flags security concerns as Rohingya Habeas plea triggers sharp remarks

SC to Waqf Boards: Fix your own mess; UMEED portal deadline remains December 6

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

PM Modi presents Putin with Bhagavad Gita, chess set, and silver horse

Cultural ties strengthened: PM Modi presents Putin with Bhagavad Gita, chess set, and silver horse

Image for representational purpose only, Courtesy Vocal Media

Bihar to get ‘Special Economic Zones’ in Buxar and West Champaran

Thirupparankundram Karthigai Deepam utsav

Andhra Pradesh: AP Dy CM Pawan Kalyan reacts to Thirupparankundram row, flags concern over religious rights of Hindus

23rd India-Russia Annual Summit

India-Russia Summit heralds new chapter in time-tested ties: Inks MoUs in economic, defence, tourism & education

DGCA orders probe into IndiGo flight disruptions; Committee to report in 15 days

BJYM leader Shyamraj with Janaki

Kerala: Widow of BJP worker murdered in 1995 steps into electoral battle after three decades at Valancherry

Russian Sber bank has unveiled access to its retail investors to the Indian stock market by etching its mutual fund to Nifty50

Scripting economic bonhomie: Russian investors gain access to Indian stocks, Sber unveils Nifty50 pegged mutual funds

Petitioner S Vignesh Shishir speaking to the reporters about the Rahul Gandhi UK citizenship case outside the Raebareli court

Rahul Gandhi UK Citizenship Case: Congress supporters create ruckus in court; Foreign visit details shared with judge

(L) Kerala High Court (R) Bouncers in Trippoonithura temple

Kerala: HC slams CPM-controlled Kochi Devaswom Board for deploying bouncers for crowd management during festival

Fact Check: Rahul Gandhi false claim about govt blocking his meet with Russian President Putin exposed; MEA clears air

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies