Sena Falls from Electoral Basket

Published by
Archive Manager

Intro: It has been just few days since the BJP broke up with the Shiv Sena (and the NCP with the Congress). But there is already a long list of people who have hopped on to the Modi bandwagon, with no instance of anyone leaving the BJP to join other parties.

In 1923, Pt Jawaharlal Nehru drew up a plan for electoral reforms in the Allahabad Corporation. It was generously garnished with quotations from a French Philosopher, Montesquieu bewildering—much to Nehru's irritation—those unfamiliar with him. (Many mocked Rahul Gandhi's “escape velocity of Jupiter” analogy; using unfamiliar references might be a family trait.)
I have no idea how acquainted Narendra Modi is with Montesquieu; I do know that he is thoroughly steeped in Kautilya, both with prescriptions of the Arthashastra and with the persona of the Mudrarakshasa.
It would be a trifling task to update the play for own times, would it not?
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) struck a pact with the Shiv Sena to bring down a mutual foe. But after Bal Thackeray's demise, his son, Uddhav, was moved to demand the top job in Maharashtra.
Having brought up Kautilya, let me quote the man himself. The seventh chapter of the Arthashastra is titled 'On the Six fold Strategy'. In its first section Kautilya numbers the virtues of the exemplary ally thus, “consistent, submissive, not prone to duplicity, eminent, and able to mobilise quickly.” Kautilya went on to add that, “Someone is an ally only to the extent that he provides assistance, given that providing assistance is the defining characteristic of an ally.”
By that definition the Sena ceased to be an ally when it started making demands rather than providing assistance. It meant that Sena could no longer play a role in Modi's long-term plan, which is to win the General Election-2019. With that goal always in mind, the BJP's current leadership has three specific objectives. First, it wants to be seen as the natural party of governance in states where it already plays a significant role. Second, it wants to be seen as the natural alternative in states where it has a presence but is not currently a major force. And third, it wants to establish a firm foothold in states where it is almost entirely absent as of 2014.
The BJP believes that it has little to lose from a loss of alliance with the Shiv Sena. Irrespective of what happens, Modi will continue as a Prime Minister with an unshakeable majority in the Lok Sabha. Fighting alone gives the BJP the chance to test its troops today, and then rework its tactics if necessary, before the big test in 2019.
The BJP can outflank the Sena, the Congress, and the National Congress Party (NCP) easily on specific issues of governance. It can also, justifiably, claim to be a party that backs achievers, rather than a dynastic party—which is exactly what these three parties happen to be.
Does that mean the BJP will form the next ministry in Maharashtra? No, of course not. For a start there is no chief ministerial candidate to lead its campaign, an essential feature of every successful BJP campaign, whether Vidhan Sabha polls in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Goa, or the General Election across India. These are early days but my impression is that none of the four forces—BJP, Shiv Sena, Congress, NCP—will win 145 seats (the barest of majorities in the 288-strong Vidhan Sabha). That said, the behaviour of local leaders suggests that there is a current in the BJP's favour. As I write it has been just few days since the BJP broke up with the Shiv Sena (and the NCP with the Congress). But there is already a long list of people who have hopped on to the Modi bandwagon.There has, as far as I know, been no instance of anyone leaving the BJP to join the other parties. And while the Shiv Sena and the NCP have also poached on others' turfs, there has been no reported case of anyone joining the Congress.
Please note that there is no ideology involved. Those that were members of the 'secular' Congress and the NCP yesterday are now queuing up to join the 'communal forces'. Kautilya, that supreme realist, would not have been surprised. As he expressed it succinctly in the sixth chapter of his masterwork, “Success is happiness”. Come counting day on October 19, which party will be happiest? The most successful one, of course!

-TVR Shenoy (The writer is a senior columnist)

Tectonic Change, Presidents Rule in the State

Intro: With the changed scenario, Maharashtra assembly elections have turned into a multi-cornered contest, with Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), two national parties testing their ground while Shiv Sena, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) will look for regional domination.

Maharashtra Asssembly elections are around the corner and State politics has seen a tectonic change in the last few days. The equations that were stable for more than two decades have changed forever. For the forthcoming Assembly elections, the 25 year old BJP-Shiv Sena alliance has come to an end on the issue of seat sharing. On expected lines, already strained Congress-NCP alliance has also collapsed. This has completely changed the complexion of Maharashtra politics and brought the State under President’s rule.

State: Maharashtra
Each region of Maharashtra has been a stronghold for some or the other political party. Vidarbha has been a stronghold of BJP while Mumbai-Konkan was Shiv Sena’s forte. NCP-Congress has been dominant in Western Maharashtra. Seat sharing showed alliance formations were also based on the same logic of sub-regional domination. The 2014 Lok Sabha elections and emergence of BJP as the most dominant party by winning 23 out of 24 seats while the regional partner Shiv Sena won 18 out of 22 seats contested.
With the changed scenario, Maharashtra Assembly elections have turned into a multi-cornered contest, with Congress and BJP, two national parties testing their ground while Shiv Sena, MNS and NCP will look for regional domination. This has also opened the aspirations of many political activists who didn’t get a chance to contest elections due to alliance constraints.
Obviously, it will also impact the elections result. While BJP is confident of continuing its Lok Sabha performance, while Shiv Sena and MNS set to pitch for Marathi manoos and anti-incumbency against the Congress-NCP government. The ruling parties are not fighting independently for their space in the State politics. There major worry is the inroads made by the saffron parties, especially BJP, in the Western parts of Maharashtra where both the Congress parties have entrenched their influence through cooperative structures and favourable caste combination. Both the parties have also given a last ditch to tackle the anti-incumbency by playing the Maratha-Muslim reservation card.
Corruption, undoubtedly, will be the most important issue in the elections and both the Congress and NCP have already started blaming each other for corruption and misgovernance. Image management is a big problem for the Pawar family led NCP while policy paralysis is a major hurdle for the Congress.
BJP is effectively riding on the performance of Modi government at the Centre. With breakage of alliance with Shiv Sena, it will openely go for non-Marathi votes, which is visible even in the ticket distribution. Alliance with smaller allies like RPI (Athawale), Mahadev Jankar led RSP and Raju Shetty led Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghatana has also put the BJP in advantageous position.
Like Lok Sabha elections, youth electorates are going to play a major role in this election. How effectively parties can use their campaign and connect with the youth of all regions of Maharashtra is going to decide the electoral outcome.                         —Prasad Joshi from Maharashtra



Share
Leave a Comment