Dr Pramod Pathak
As expected some authors, especially like Arundhati Roy this time was not fierce but lamented (Times of India Feb 12, 2014) as to why Penguins have succumbed to the Hindu rightist’s pressure. Shobha De felt that Penguins have buckled under the external pressure form the right wing Hindu zealots (Times of India Dt Feb 16, 2014). They did not buckle, on the contrary), made a smart business deal. She did not felt like paying attention to the reality that editorial board of Penguins must have felt really ashamed that they did not apply Confused about their usual editorial scrutiny and accepted the text as submitted by the author. Expected brouhaha
As it was expected that the secular Freedom of Speech loving community from select group to came out with offended feelings and that along with Wendy, martyrdom of like of James Laine, MF Husain, Siddharth Deb, Bhargava and Badopadhyay was evoked. Book withdrawal by Penguins was declared as great victory of the rightist Hindu forces. While Arundhati Roy lamented, Ratna Kapoor, AnanyaVajpeyi, Sheldon Pollock, RomilaThaparand others signed an open letter condemning the decision and proposed for repealing of the section of the 153A and 259A of the Indian Penal Code (The Hindu Feb 15). Ramchandra Guha was forthright in condemning the Hindu as well as Muslim bigots (The Times of India Dt Feb 13). The co-author of Wendy, Sudhir Kakar meekly submitted, “So what we are talking here is Islam. So yes, there is certain caution exercised by scholars here. But then if a certain section of Muslims is intolerant and violently, so does this mean all Hindus should follow the same example?”(Times of India Feb 16). Inturn Kakar conceded that all these scholars are cowards and dare not tell the truth in the face of adversaries. To note here, the Hindus were not violent. They only protested and took recourse to civil action and agreed for out of the court settlement.
No reference to the text
All the so called thinkers and contributors to the English newspapers, listed above, seem to have not even browsed Wendy’s book. They would have noted umpteen mistakes and inaccuracies, and would have certainly withheld their remarks about the decision to withdraw the book. However they have manifested flock mentality as usual. On the contrary, scholarly reviews in prestigious journals, by social scientist and American Journal of Oriental Society have criticised poor historiography and lack of focus. Vedic scholar from Harvard, Michael Witzel too was critical of Wendy’s book. But for the Indian secularists she is epitome of scholarship.
Publish criticism volumeIn this book Wendy has lost her bearing. She appears to have done away with the precision in her scholarship she had shown it in her earlier works. It is pity that the western scholars have not yet come out of their colonial mind set and the Indian secularist have not come out of the slavish mentality. They write false histories of Asia and Indian subcontinent. The perceptions of the Native American policy makers are coloured by these half-truth histories and they formulate their international strategies. That is why strong nation like USA has not been able to win a single war in the post-World War II era. The Penguins would have done well to publish volume of critical essays published mostly on the web. That could have been sold like a hot cake. Scholars and lay people as well would have known both the shades of opinion, it could have been a real intellectual exercise.
(The writer is a Vedic scholar based in Goa. He is Ph. D. in the Vedic literature, authored books on the Vedas and is a freelance writer. drpvpathak@yahoo.co.in)
The publisher also said that copies of the said book have been sent to four scholars independently for review and is waiting for their response till next week. The publisher also assured that the book would not be reissued until the concerns are addressed for acceptable resolution of the whole matter.
But Shri Dina Nath Batra, convener of Shiksha Bachao Andoland Samiti is not satisfied with the response of the publisher and said they would take all democratic and legal steps to see that this mala-fide book also comes to an end if the demands are not fulfilled. Talking to Organiser he said the intention of Wendy Doniger is to mollify Hinduism by bringing out exaggerated sex prevailing in Hinduism and the content of the book present sexy pictures of Ramayana and Mahabharata which is worse than the previous book.—Heena Nanda
Hindus are upset over an article in Arkansas”s John Brown University (JBU) student newspaper calling Hindu gods as ‘demonic’ and Hinduism as ‘ugly religion’. Distinguished Hindu statesman Rajan Zed, in a statement in Nevada (USA) said such statements coming out of an educational institution were really shocking.
Shri Zed, who is president of Universal Society of Hinduism, urged JBU President Dr Charles Pollard to apologize to the Hindu community and immediately withdraw the March 13 (Issue 18, Volume 79) print edition of The Threefold Advocate from circulation and remove the objectionable article from its online edition.He pointed out that it was highly inappropriate for a publication of educational institution like JBU, which was listed as one of America”s Best Colleges by Forbes, to belittle Hinduism, which was the oldest and third largest religion of the world with about one billion adherents and a rich philosophical thought.
Our gods were highly revered to us and we considered them divine and worship them and our religion was very sacred to us. JBU, which claimed to be an educational leader providing “academic, spiritual and professional foundation for world-impacting careers” to students from across the globe, should be more sensitive about the feelings of ” others”, he noted.
Leave a Comment