Readers? Forum

Rape of democracy by UPA Sunday is  the only day   on  which an ordinary newspaper  reader  can  afford to  spend  some  time  in  reading  any Sunday story  flashed by  a newspaper.  One  such Sunday story published by Sunday Express   dated March 24,  2013,   is  captioned  “ MHA agrees  to special  courts  for  Muslims ‘falsely  held’ in  terror cases”. In  other  words,  it  appears  that,  the courts  are  directed  to assume   that  the Muslims  (and  not  the  non-Muslims)  held  in  terror  cases are being  held   falsely, even at the outset  of  the  trial. It  also means  that  the onus  of the proof  lies  with  the  prosecution and  alleged  culprit  is free  to keep his mouth  shut, provided he  is  a  Muslim! While   the  leaders  of the   so-called Indian  National Congress loudly  claims  to   the  world,  that  the terror  has no religion,   we  fail  to understand  why  a special  court   should be  instituted,  exclusively   for dealing  with Muslims accused  of terror. Is it not enough for the so-called  Indian  National  Congress  to  talk  vociferously  about  the  virtues  of secularism.  Their  sense  of secularism  should  be  uncompromisingly  honest  and  sincere,  irrespective  of  caste, colour,  creed  or religion. Nationalists  of this  country would  like to remind   pseudo- secularists  of all  hues  that  there  is  no such thing  as  Hindu terror or  Muslim  terror    so far   as  terrorism  is concerned. Rape  of  democracy is  a rape,  irrespective  of whether  it is committed   in  the name  of emergency  or  pseudo- secularism!
KS IYER, Delhi

Foreigners come here to loot, not save us (Organiser, 10.3.2013); This refers to ‘Foreigners come here to loot, not save us’ by Dr Jay Dubashi in Organiser. He has mentioned various wrongs done by foreigners. However calling Lord Mountbatten “as the last rascal, who cut not only our throats but also our country all the time using his wife to ensnare our leaders” is uncharitable. It seems that Dr Dubashi has blamed Lord Mountbatten, only to hide the sins of Gandhiji and Jawaharlal Nehru.  Very shameful indeed. Lord Mountbatten was a very reasonable person and Hindus should be thankful to him, mainly for two reasons. Firstly, when he took over as Viceroy thousands of Hindus had been killed  and were being slaughtered in Bengal and West Punjab, as a result of “Direct Action” called by Jinnah and Muslim League to attain Pakistan. Gandhiji, Nehru and Congress leaders were least bothered about the killings and loot of Hindus by the Muslims. Infact Gandhiji was of the firm opinion, that Hindus have no right to retaliate in self-defence, and should accept their death with honour as “no training is required for dying”. Here it would be  quite relevant to mention, that once KM Munshi asked Gandhiji, that the Hindus should have the right to retaliate in self-defence, when attacked by Muslims. Gandhiji replied that, such persons should leave the Congress. When Sardar Patel proposed Munshi’s name for Governorship of West Bengal after Partition in 1947, Mahatma felt that his  i.e. Munshi’s reputation of being unsympathetic to Muslims disqualified him (see page-139-140 The Rajaji Story 1937-72—by Rajmohan Gandhi, Published by Bharatiya Vidya  Bhawan—Bombay—1994). Thus Gandhiji, was concerned only about the wellbeing of those Muslims in Calcutta and West Bengal, who had slaughtered thousands of Hindus. It is also a historical fact, that Gandhiji, Nehru, Patel and Congress leaders showed little interest  towards the plight of the Hindus and Sikhs left in Pakistan, and lakhs of them were murdered. To prevent killing of Hindus and Sikhs, Lord Mountbatten prepared the  Partition Plan, and convinced Gandhiji and Nehru to agree with Pakistan as homeland for the Muslims and truncated India as homeland for the Hindus (and Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, etc.). Many British writer have mentioned truncated India  as Hindu dominion in their books on this subject. Even Jinnah was of the view, that after creation of Pakistan as homeland for the Muslims, the remaining ‘Hindustan’ would be the homeland for the Hindus. It were only Gandhiji, Nehru, Patel and Congress leaders, who intentionally and sinfully prevented truncated India to become a homeland—a safe place for the  Hindus. Lord Mountbatten convinced Jinnah, that Pakistan cannot be given Hindu majority regions of Punjab and Bengal, as Hindus have the right to join India, just as the Muslims are joining Pakistan. Jinnah wanted whole of Punjab and whole of Bengal and Assam. Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi had 14 meetings with Jinnah in 1944 at Bombay, but  could not convince him on this issue. Hindus must be grateful to Lord Mountbatten and not to Gandhi and his followers. 
ANAND PRAKASH,                                                                                                              72/Sector-8, Panchkula-134 109

Sri Lankan Tamils issue This refers to the DMK Chief MK Karunanidhi’s threat to withdraw his support to  the UPA government, if India does not support the cause of Sri Lankan Tamils in UNHRC. It is these people who have been hijacking and blackmailing not only UPA government  but also our Indian Union since Independence irrespective of who is the Prime Minister or which political party is ruling the Government at the Centre. This is not the only issue, but we can see dozens of them including Cauvery issue, Mullaperiya Dam, Setusamudra project, preference in various mega projects, ministerial portfolios, political influences and many more. It is these people who tried to secede  from the Indian Union and make their own country in the name of ‘Dravidnad’ and even tried to include forcibly other states of South India including the Tamil population in Sri Lanka, then, under the leadership of Ramaswamy Periyar, but  failed miserably. It is these people, right form our country’s Independence upto this day have expressed their dissatisfaction of being in the Indian Union and showed unpatriotism towards our country and always waited for a suitable opportunity to secede from Indian Union to  make their own home country. History also says that they have  always been hostil towards rest of India since  millennium. When Sri Lanka is an independent  country, how can anybody interfere and exert pressure on their internal matter of their country affairs. We have huge Indian origin population worldwide, such as  in Malaysia, Middle-East, Australia, many African coutries. And just because Sri lanka, which is peaceful country and not indulging in any terrorist activity and is our immediate neighbour, we cannot  take things for granted. Do we dare to interfere in our other neighbouring countries like Bangaladesh or Pakistan, where our Indian origins are humiliated many times more than Sri Lankan Tamils. We appeal to Indian Union to not to take any haste decision in this matter and maintain enough of diplomacy and protocol in UNHRC.
SETURAM ASPARI,  email: asparam@rediffmail.com