Stench in Dr Manmohan’s prescription to kill Indian retail

Published by
Archive Manager

Kick-back scandals tarnish UPA’s Retail FDI

BOWING under the Opposition’s pressure, the Manmohan Singh government has finally agreed to order a  probe into lobbying practices by Walmart Stores Inc.(WMT.N). There have been  allegations that the giant retailer had pressed U.S. lawmakers to help gain access to  foreign markets.  Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath told parliament a retired  judge would be appointed to lead an investigation “pertaining to Walmart’s lobbying”.

Walmart disclosed in a report to the U.S. Senate that it had paid $25 million (Rs 125  crore) over four years to lobby American lawmakers to help gain access to overseas  markets, including India.
The Centre’s modus-operandi to push the FDI in multibrand retail made it evident that  there was more than what met the eye in this contentious deal. The report spurred opposition lawmakers, who oppose Walmart’s entry into India, to call  for an inquiry into whether any money was spent in India, even though the disclosure filing  only referred to lobbying activities in the United States.

In its disclosure filed with the US Senate, Walmart has said it spent close to $25 million  (about Rs 125 crore) since 2008 on its various lobbying activities, including on the issues  related to “enhanced market access for investment in India”. However, Bharti Walmart  issued a statement, saying the opposition allegations of corruption are “entirely false”. It  said the amount mentioned in its disclosure is a “compilation of expenses associated with  staff, association dues, consultants and contributions spent in the US.”

The Walmart lobbying issue had triggered a political storm with the BJP demanding a  statement from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Parliament and the CPI-M and SP  joining it in seeking an independent probe into the “serious allegations” of bribery.

“BJP would like the PM to explain why he did not initiate inquiry and what he proposed  to do now when it has become evident that multi-brand retail FDI has come on the  shoulders of lobbying and bribery,” BJP chief spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said.

Senior BJP leader and former party president, Venkaiah Naidu said, “We demand that  Prime Minister should come to the House and make a statement on the issue. It should  also be followed up with an independent inquiry.”
There have been reports that following the government’s decision to allow 51 per cent FDI  in multibrand retail, Walmart had gone on record saying that it would open stores in India  in the next two years.

However, without a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) between India and the US,  Walmart’s investments in India are likely to be governed solely by domestic laws. A report  in an English daily stated that  ” if India and the US enter into a BIT, Walmart, reportedly  being probed for violating forex laws in India, will have the protection of the treaty in its  interactions with every organ of the Indian state, whether it is the executive, the legislature  or the judiciary.”
It may be recalled here that following the return of  Barack Obama both India and US are  expected to speed up the process of  bilateral engagement between the two nation. 

Incidentally the negotiations for an India-US BIT have been ongoing since 2008-2009.  There have been allegations and reports that Walmart has been investing heavily in  India even when there was a ban on FDI. Certain reports claim that Walmart has   allegedly invested $100 million in a domestic unit owned by Bharti Enterprises, its  wholesale joint-venture partner.  It may be recalled that the retail giant  faces charges of  tax evasion and money laundering in Mexico.
In this context protection of BIT could make a huge difference to Walmart in India. In India so far only nine states have decided to allow foreign retailers. But any  change in electoral politics in these states could block Walmart’s attempt to set shop in  these states. Under India-US BIT, (if the agreement is signed) Walmart could drag India  into investor-state arbitration under the India-US BIT.

An article NITI Central pointed out the superstore will kill small time retailers. “Superstores require huge spaces – for building as well as for parking. A superstore may  need anything between 100,000 to 250,000 square feet of building space and almost 3  times that for parking space. Given the compact nature of our cities, it would be  impossible to find such open spaces within cities’ normal residential limits. Even if such  spaces can be found, superstores may not go for them as customers normally like to avoid  traffic and congested areas. When a superstore is opened in the outskirts of a city, isn’t it  going to attract customers from the surrounding villages and suburban areas? Retailers  from the surrounding villages will suffer as a result, “ the article stated.

It further pointed out  that “another side effect of superstores in the USA is the downfall  of downtown areas. Once blustering retail shopping hubs, many such locations have now  turned into ghost towns.”
The statistics show that “in the  USA, between 1992 and 2002, the grocery industry lost  13,000 stores and thousands of jobs as per Retail Forward. As per Iowa State University  study, during the first decade after Walmart arrived in Iowa, the State lost 555 grocery  stores, 298 hardware stores, 293 building supply stores, 161 variety stores, 158 women’s  apparel stores, 153 shoe stores, 116 drug stores, and 111 men’s and boys’ apparel stores.

Fast forward these numbers 10 years from now for any given Indian city – say Pune –  and think about the impact on the city as well as surrounding suburbs and villages.” A blog in the socialistwork.org reads : “The little towns are dead, the small towns are  dying, the small cities, well…wouldn’t it just be easier if we gave up and made Walmart  into a kind of universal government store? We could just all line up once a week for our  flour and our sugar, coke and chips and chocolate, a pair of cheap plastic shoes twice a  year, some frozen chicken—because, folks, that’s exactly where we are headed if we don’t  fight Walmart now, and others like them pretty damn quick.”

In India like across the globe, it is not going to stop with Walmart.  IKEA, a home- furnishing and kitchen store, has already made announcements to enter India. Others like  Home Depot (building material, construction), Office Max (school and office supplies),  Best Buy (electronics and appliances), Walgreen (drugs and cosmetics) among others are  waiting in wings to reach Indian shores.
And as small time retailers burn, like Nero, the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh will play the lyre.

 

Share
Leave a Comment