Current Issue
Organiser Home
Editorial
EXPOSE
Reports
Comment
The Moving Finger Writes
Media Watch
Thinking Aloud
Bookmark
A PAGE FROM HISTORY
RETROSPECT
Kids Org.
News Round-up
Readers’ Forum:
INTERESTING PEOPLE
PERSPECTIVE
Kerala Newsletter

Previous Issues
September 04, 2011

August 28, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 14, 2011
August 07, 2011

July 31, 2011
July 24, 2011
July 17, 2011
July 10, 2011
July 03, 2011

June 26, 2011
June 19, 2011
June 12, 2011
June 05, 2011

May 29, 2011
May 22, 2011
May 15, 2011
May 08, 2011
May 01, 2011

April 24, 2011
April 17, 2011
April 10, 2011
April 03, 2011

March 27, 2011
March 20, 2011
March 13, 2011
March 06, 2011

February 27, 2011
February 20, 2011
February 13, 2011
February 06, 2011

January 30, 2011
January 23, 2011
January 16, 2011
January 09, 2011
January 02, 2011

December 26, 2010
December 19, 2010
December 12, 2010
December 05, 2010
November 28, 2010
November 21, 2010
November 14, 2010
November 7, 2010

October 31, 2010
October 24, 2010
October 17, 2010
October 10, 2010
October 03, 2010

2010 Issues
2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues

Organiser
About us
Advertisement
Circulation
Contact us

Subscribe


September 11, 2011




Page: 10/42

Home > 2011 Issues > September 11, 2011

Comment
Let Parliament protect what UPA lost: Credibility

By Amba Charan Vashishth

PARLIAMENT is supreme, sovereign. It is its exclusive prerogative to legislate. It derives its sovereignty from the people —”We, the people” who have given unto themselves the Constitution and thereby delegated their sovereignty to its organs, including the Parliament. Still, the ultimate sovereignty resides with the people.

The issue of Parliament’s supremacy was raised by parliamentarians themselves, at the height of Anna Hazare’s crusade against corruption insisting on Parliament enact the Jan Lokpal Bill urgently. Some protested that Parliament could not be coerced into passing a bill drafted by a private party or association on the pain of a fast.

But this was exactly the course adopted by Mahatma Gandhi in his fight against the alien British rulers when he embarked upon fasts to force them accede his demands. Further, it is fallacious to treat Anna’s fast as a mere threat to force his views on Parliament. It was a countrywide movement against corruption which culminated into spontaneous bursting of support for the cause from every section of society in almost every corner of the country.

The Anna fast will go down in history as the most peaceful and non-violent movement where not even a simple brawl took place and police had not to use force. It gave lie to the prophets of doom in the UPA who raised the bogey of “threat to peace” if Hazare was allowed to fast and people were allowed to assemble at JP Park as planned earlier.

MPs are people’s elected representatives who should always keep their finger on the pulse of the people and reflect the same in their functioning. If some of our MPs were trying to overlook the spontaneous support for Anna Hazare, it only laid bare disconnect with their own people. If there was some rancour and use of some unsavoury words by people, it was because of the frustration and anger generated by the everyday changing posture of the government. Had the government done on August 14 what it did on August 27 to respect the will of the people, much of the bitterness could have been avoided and nation’s money and energy saved for better purposes. It is a victory for India, its people, the Constitution and its organs.

It is also a hard reality that the legislature has not always been found to be right. This fact manifested itself a number of times in the past. The legislators do not necessarily vote for or against as per the call of their conscience. They raise their hands in faithful obedience to the whip of their political bosses. In the process, many a times, the people’s interests get overlooked. Recall the fact that it was the Parliament which had put its seal of approval into killing democracy in 1975 by late Mrs. Indira Gandhi by imposing emergency and enacting draconian laws curtailing freedom of Press, speech, expression and fundamental rights.The Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act 1983 met a similar fate. In all such cases, the people stood not with the Parliament but with the courts.

Whether it is construed as a ‘unanimous’ resolution or the ‘sense of the House’ on August 27, a doubt is being raised in some quarters that it was just a ploy to make Anna end his fast. But if Parliament fails to honour the word it gave to Anna and the nation, the loss this time would be that of the integrity of Parliament. In that eventuality, it would not be Anna or the mobocracy, but Parliament alone to blame for attracting the ire of the people.




Previous Page Previous Page (9/42) - Next Page (11/42) Next Page


copyright© 2004 Bharat Prakashan(Delhi) Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Hosted by KSHEERAJA Web Solutions Pvt Ltd