The BJP attacked the Congress party on April 27, for its pre-election pledge to give public work contracts to members of the “minority community.”
Amit Malviya, the national spokesperson for the BJP, tweeted, “Another gem from Congress manifesto: We will ensure that the minorities receive their fair share of opportunities in education, healthcare, public employment, public works contracts, skill development, sports and cultural activities without discrimination.”
Another gem from Congress manifesto:
We will ensure that the minorities receive their fair share of opportunities in education, healthcare, public employment, public works contracts, skill development, sports and cultural activities without discrimination.
Just how will… pic.twitter.com/9PwoeDcoGT
— Amit Malviya (मोदी का परिवार) (@amitmalviya) April 27, 2024
“Just how will Congress ensure that minorities (read Muslims) get fair share in ‘public works contract’? Will there be religious quota along with technical and financial bid?” he pointed out.
The BJP spokesperson added, “Will qualified bidders be overlooked in favour of Muslims? Will Hindus have to become subservient to the minorities, to win a public contract, even if they are competent enough to do so on their own? Isn’t this laying the foundation for ‘Tender Ghotala’?”
“The Congress not only wants to capture the wealth of SCs/STs/OBCs, take over small savings of Hindu women, including gold and their mangalsutra, and distribute it among the minorities but also deny them opportunities to earn a livelihood with dignity. What kind of India does the Congress want to build?” Amit Malviya concluded.
The Congress party had promised to provide minority communities with a “fair share” of opportunities in public work contracts on Page 8 of its “Nyay Patra.”
As the electoral battle heats up, the clash between the BJP and Congress over ideological differences and campaign promises underscores the polarising nature of Indian politics and the challenges of fostering inclusive development while navigating complex social dynamics.
Comments