The Congress party, already grappling with electoral decline and internal fractures, has been thrown into yet another crisis this time ignited not by an opponent but by one of its own. Dr Navjot Kaur Sidhu’s explosive allegation that a “Rs 500-crore suitcase” decides who becomes Chief Minister has not only rattled the party’s leadership but also resurrected a long trail of similar accusations that have dogged the Congress for years.
The fallout has been swift and severe, she has been suspended from the primary membership of the party with immediate effect. But the political damage both internal and external appears far from contained.
The remark was made on December 6, right after Navjot Kaur Sidhu emerged from a meeting with Punjab Governor Gulab Chand Kataria. Answering a question regarding her husband Navjot Singh Sidhu’s political comeback, she said:
“He will return only if he is named the CM face. We don’t have Rs 500 crore to offer for that post.” In that single sentence, Dr Sidhu cracked open a vault of long-suspected, rarely admitted, and internally whispered claims about how power circles within Congress operate.
Within hours, the remark was splashed across national headlines. Rival political parties pounced with vengeance. Congress scrambled into damage control mode. And political observers watched as an inner-party allegation became a national embarrassment.
Dr. Sidhu’s comment did not emerge in isolation it mirrors a grim pattern.
1. Margaret Alva’s ‘Open Auction’ Accusation (Karnataka 2008)
Former Union Minister and veteran Congress leader Margaret Alva wrote in her book Courage and Commitment that the 2008 Karnataka Congress ticket distribution was an open auction where the highest bidder secured the candidature. She described it as a systemic practice, not an aberration.
At the time, Congress dismissed Alva’s revelations as “her personal view”. Sixteen years later, the allegations resurface in a new form and this time from Punjab.
2. Women Congress leaders’ claims: ‘Chamdi’ and ‘Damdi’
Multiple female leaders within the party have spoken about internal discrimination, saying tickets were often handed out based on caste (“chamdi”) and money (“damdi”), cementing allegations that the party’s selection processes are neither democratic nor merit-based.
3. Internal whispers, public punishment: Dr Sidhu now becomes the latest in a lineage of Congress leaders who publicly raised concerns and faced disciplinary blowback instead of inquiry or reform.
Punjab Congress President Amarinder Singh Raja Warring released a terse yet telling one-line order, “Dr Navjot Kaur Sidhu is hereby suspended from the primary membership of the party with immediate effect.”
- No explanation.
- No clarification.
- No committee.
- No counter-evidence.
- Just punishment.
Senior Congress leaders immediately distanced themselves.
Partap Singh Bajwa (LoP), “It is the right decision. You cannot make such baseless allegations.” Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa (MP, former Deputy CM), “If Sidhu was made minister and state president, how much did he pay? The high command must take note.” The tone across Congress ranks was uniform: attack the Sidhus, but avoid addressing the substance of the charge.
Navjot Singh Sidhu, once one of Congress’s most visible faces in Punjab, has had a turbulent relationship with the party high command since 2017.
- He was made a minister
- Later removed
- Then made Punjab Congress President
- Then sidelined again
- In the aftermath of the Punjab government collapse in 2022, Sidhu gradually retreated from active politics.
Now, as talk of 2027 elections begins, the couple resurfaced with a demand and a bombshell, “Make Navjot Sidhu the CM face or we stay out.” The 500-crore remark was made in this context.
The AAP took a sharp swipe, asking whether the alleged Rs 500-crore “suitcase” was meant for the party high command or specifically for Rahul Gandhi.
The BJP Sunil Jakhar claimed the comment exposed what he called the Congress’s “institutionalised corruption,” while Tarun Chugh added that the Sidhus had revealed a truth that many insiders had long been too afraid to voice. For both AAP and BJP, the controversy feeds directly into their long-standing narrative that Congress is steeped in cash-based and dynasty-driven politics.
After the uproar intensified, she posted a clarification saying her words were being twisted. “Congress never demanded anything from us. I only meant that we would never pay money to any party for a leadership role.”
But the clarification failed to neutralise the backlash. It also did not address the core question, Was she merely making a hypothetical comment or revealing an open secret? Meanwhile, the public is left with unanswered questions. The episode highlights a deeper, structural problem within the Congress party:
1. Chronic internal distrust: Leaders accuse one another publicly. Disciplinary action replaces dialogue.
2. Opaque decision-making: Power flows downward from Delhi, not upward from workers.
3. Factionalism at every level: Punjab, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh rival camps remain entrenched.
4. Repeated allegations no internal cleansing:
Whether it’s Alva’s 2008 claims or the Sidhus’ 2024 remark, the pattern repeats: Allegation → Outrage → Suspension → Silence
- No inquiry.
- No transparent reform.
- No structural change.
The Sidhus remain influential and have a following. Their open confrontation damages Congress’s credibility in Punjab already a battlefield where AAP is in power and BJP is expanding aggressively.
Comments