Foreign-funded, Church-backed nuclear power chaos in India
Thursday, May 19, 2022
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • RSS in News
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
SUBSCRIBE
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • RSS in News
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • RSS in News
  • Subscribe
Home General

Foreign-funded, Church-backed nuclear power chaos in India

Archive Manager by Archive Manager
Mar 4, 2012, 12:00 am IST
in General
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterTelegramEmail

FROM THE FRONT PAGE

By Adhitya Srinivasan

Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh’s recent remarks on the anti-Kudankulam protests have probably created more noise and elicited more reaction than anything else that he has said over the last eight years. This may be because for the first time he has displayed the willingness and the political courage to take on anti-national elements.

Dr Singh has announced what till recently was only whispered: The anti-Kudankulam nuclear reactor protests are being orchestrated and funded by foreign powers. In keeping with our unapologetically nationalist stance, Organiser Weekly was the first to consistently analyse the protests from this angle. We first argued that there was far too much coincidence for the protests to be viewed as just another local mobilisation against a development project (‘Probe and Expose the Ploy’, Organiser, 30.10.2011). We then suggested that the anti-KKNPP protests were consistent with a larger trend of activity that appeared to be focussed on ensuring that India’s nuclear capability remains undeveloped (‘Catholic Church in Kudankulam Mess’, Organiser, 17.12.2011).

$img_titleBefore we return to discuss the latest round of allegations and war of words, it is imperative to review some pressing questions about the Kudankulam protest and nuclear technology in India that remain unanswered:

Why was the protest against the Kudankulam nuclear reactor organised just months before the reactor was commissioned? In any case, why did it take until now for such large-scale mobilisation of protestors?

Was there an invisible/foreign hand that had calculated the timing of the protests in a manner so as to embarrass Russian nuclear technology? The Prime Minister now says that NGOs based out of US and Scandinavia have been funding the protest.

Why was the Church playing a more than proactive role in organising the protests against the nuclear reactor at this juncture? Have local churches themselves been compromised?

Are the Church and its leadership being used or allowing themselves to be used as a front for the protest by larger players?

Does the church fear that missionary activity in general and conversion activity in particular will take a hit if the nuclear project is allowed to function? As a corollary, does the church believe that opposition to the nuclear project will assist them in future missionary work?

What is the source for all the money that is required to organise the protest and mobilise protestors? How much money is being spent by the protestors on a daily/weekly/monthly basis?

Why was former President, Dr. Abdul Kalam’s assurances on the safety of the Kudankulam plant (after careful inspection) dismissed without a thought? How can the people of any self-respecting Republic tolerate such an insult on their former President?


$img_titleWhy was former President, Dr. Abdul Kalam’s assurances on the safety of the Kudankulam plant (after careful inspection) dismissed without a thought? How can the people of any self-respecting Republic tolerate such an insult on their former President?


Why did the Bishop of Tuticorin abruptly direct priests and nuns against participating in the anti-Kudankulam protests and why did the good Bishop retract from this directive with equal abruptness?

Is there a national trend where local church groups block efforts at enriching uranium (in Jharkhand, Meghalaya, etc.) which is so crucial to our energy requirements?

Why have no nuclear energy benefits been transferred to India as a consequence of the Indo-US Nuclear Deal? In the absence of any energy benefits, would it be fair to say that the nuclear deal was just a decoy to end Indian nuclear tests?

Organiser Weekly had also called for a thorough probe into the funding of the anti-Kudankulam protests. Investigations conducted by the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) as well as the Tamil Nadu state police have revealed interesting details. The Union Home Ministry has cancelled the licenses of three non-governmental organisations (NGOs) based on investigation leads that they were diverting funds for the anti-Kudankulam protests. It is believed that two of these NGOs (Tuticorin Diocese Association and Tuticorin Multipurpose Social Service Society) are administered by Bishop Ambroise of Tuticorin. These NGOs were shown as having clearance under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 until last year.

Most recently, the ‘Q’ branch of Tamil Nadu police, invested with the responsibility of monitoring the activities of NGOs in the state, arrested a German national, Sonnteg Reiner Hermann in Nagercoil on charges of illegally sourcing funds for the Kudankulam protests. Immigration officials state that his visa will be cancelled and that he will be deported shortly. A surprise check on his lodge revealed that he had not only been mobilising funds for the Kudankulam protest but also that he was in touch with Lalmohan, a close aide of S Udayakumar who heads the People’s Movement Against Nuclear Energy (PMANE) and is leading the anti-Kudankulam agitation.

Udayakumar has made his tiff with the Central Government personal. He has threatened to sue Union Minister V Narayanswamy as well as Prime Minister Dr Singh. He asserts that his organisation has not received foreign assistance, financially or otherwise. These statements are mere posturing. Udayakumar probably knows that the financial transactions were structured in a manner such that his organisation was not the direct recipient of foreign money. But with each passing day, new information trickles in and continues to demolish Udayakumar’s claim. Will Udayakumar publicly assure the Indian people that he has not directly or indirectly received funds from abroad? The evidence recovered from the Hermann arrest would expose any such assurance.

In all of this bickering, we cannot afford to forget the larger issues that are at stake. Our country has come so close to being held hostage to the whims of a foreign state’s policies. It is important to expose the Kudankulam protest. But more important is the need to break the horrible chain by which our national interests came so close to being compromised. The Kudankulam chain involved four entities: the foreign government(s) that is opposed to Indian nuclear capability, the foreign NGOs which are well-funded by the aforementioned foreign government(s), local NGOs, groups (including local churches) who pressurise the Indian government through protest backed by the receipt of money from foreign NGOs through whatever complex structure they devise for this purpose and the protestors who are mobilised for the purpose. Accordingly, it would be well for the Home Ministry to pre-emptively commence investigations into such efforts rather than wait for matters to snowball as was the case in Kudankulam.

The Kudankulam chapter offers some important lessons in nationalism and social activism. Kudankulam has shown the country the dirty, destructive face of NGO activism. These NGOs are no longer concerned about engineering creative solutions to problems. Their only focus these days is to stall development work. This might have been tolerable if they took pains to offer better solutions to the government. Solution-oriented activism is not only welcomed but also needed to compliment institutional governance. Nationalism can mean many things to different people. But whatever your definition of nationalism is, it must mean being proud of India, it must mean being committed to the development of her people and above all it must mean never compromising on her integrity and sovereignty. We must congratulate Dr Singh for taking a bold stand. One sincerely hopes that after eight years of a boring and uninspiring premiership, he continues to find the courage to provide nationalist governance.

ShareTweetSendShareSend
Previous News

The hypocrisy of our intellectuals

Next News

The national mood is anti-Congress

Related News

Delhi Police arrest two more accused in Jahangirpuri anti-Hindu riots

Police arrest 5 for the terror attack on a wine shop in J-K’s Baramulla

Gyanvapi Verdict: Court refuses to change commissioner; orders to present survey report on 17 May

Sculptures of gods, Sheshnag like structures found in Gyanvapi structure: Advocate Ajay Mishra

India expresses concern over global food insecurity at ‘Global Food Security-Call to Action’ meeting

India expresses concern over global food insecurity at ‘Global Food Security-Call to Action’ meeting

Kerala High Court Quashes Scheme Allotting 80% Minority Scholarships to Muslims

Kerala HC seeks state’s response on PIL challenging 50% reservation for Muslims in Civil Service Institute

Sri Lankan economic crisis brings opportunity for the Indian tea industry

Sri Lankan economic crisis brings opportunity for the Indian tea industry

Prime Minister Narendra Modi holds virtual talks with Cambodian counterpart, discusses bilateral cooperation

Prime Minister Narendra Modi holds virtual talks with Cambodian counterpart, discusses bilateral cooperation

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Delhi Police arrest two more accused in Jahangirpuri anti-Hindu riots

Police arrest 5 for the terror attack on a wine shop in J-K’s Baramulla

Gyanvapi Verdict: Court refuses to change commissioner; orders to present survey report on 17 May

Sculptures of gods, Sheshnag like structures found in Gyanvapi structure: Advocate Ajay Mishra

India expresses concern over global food insecurity at ‘Global Food Security-Call to Action’ meeting

India expresses concern over global food insecurity at ‘Global Food Security-Call to Action’ meeting

Kerala High Court Quashes Scheme Allotting 80% Minority Scholarships to Muslims

Kerala HC seeks state’s response on PIL challenging 50% reservation for Muslims in Civil Service Institute

Sri Lankan economic crisis brings opportunity for the Indian tea industry

Sri Lankan economic crisis brings opportunity for the Indian tea industry

Prime Minister Narendra Modi holds virtual talks with Cambodian counterpart, discusses bilateral cooperation

Prime Minister Narendra Modi holds virtual talks with Cambodian counterpart, discusses bilateral cooperation

‘Yoga is India’s heritage’, says Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh ahead of International Yoga Day

‘Yoga is India’s heritage’, says Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh ahead of International Yoga Day

India moving towards becoming high-tech manufacturing economy: Piyush Goyal

Nearly 400 comprehensive GIS-based maps already prepared under PM GatiShakti National Master Plan: Piyush Goyal

Auto Draft

Independence will be established in true sense when we work keeping national interest paramount: Dr Sunil Ambekar

Gyanvapi issue will be discussed in VHP annual meeting in June: VHP President Alok Kumar

Gyanvapi issue will be discussed in VHP annual meeting in June: VHP President Alok Kumar

  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Special Report
  • Sci & Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Books
  • Interviews
  • Travel
  • Health
  • Obituary
  • Subscribe
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies