 |
|
Previous Issues
|
|
September 04, 2011
|
|
August 28, 2011
|
|
August 21, 2011
|
|
August 14, 2011
|
|
August 07, 2011
|
|
July 31, 2011
|
|
July 24, 2011
|
|
July 17, 2011
|
|
July 10, 2011
|
|
July 03, 2011
|
|
June 26, 2011
|
|
June 19, 2011
|
|
June 12, 2011
|
|
June 05, 2011
|
|
May 29, 2011
|
|
May 22, 2011
|
|
May 15, 2011
|
|
May 08, 2011
|
|
May 01, 2011
|
|
April 24, 2011
|
|
April 17, 2011
|
|
April 10, 2011
|
|
April 03, 2011
|
|
March 27, 2011
|
|
March 20, 2011
|
|
March 13, 2011
|
|
March 06, 2011
|
|
February 27, 2011
|
|
February 20, 2011
|
|
February 13, 2011
|
|
February 06, 2011
|
|
January 30, 2011 |
|
January 23, 2011 |
|
January 16, 2011 |
|
January 09, 2011 |
|
January 02, 2011
|
|
December 26, 2010 |
|
December 19, 2010 |
|
December 12, 2010 |
|
December 05, 2010 |
|
November 28, 2010 |
|
November 21, 2010 |
|
November 14, 2010 |
|
November 7, 2010
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
October 24, 2010
|
|
October 17, 2010
|
|
October 10, 2010
|
|
October 03, 2010
|
|
2010 Issues
|
|
2009 Issues
|
|
2008 Issues
|
|
2007 Issues
|
|
2006 Issues
|
|
|
July 03, 2011
Page: 24/39
Home > 2011 Issues > July 03, 2011
|
|
A survey of post -liberalisation India
By Manju Gupta Progressive Fiscal Policy in India, Praveen Jha (ed.), Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd, Pp 461 (HB),Rs 895.00
THE era of economic liberalisation since the early 1990s was witness to a paradigm shift from a largely state-guided to a market-driven framework for the Indian economy, thereby leading to significant changes in the country’s economic system. Different products and markets have been thrown open, drastically as well as internationally, leading to an overall accelerated growth, driven largely by the consumption factor of the elite. However, the same period, that is, the growth rate of commodity in producing sectors has come under pressure with the condition of the masses showing no marked improvement. The regime change has not only discouraged public investment but also prompted the State to withdraw from important sectors and grant exemption and concessions to the capitalist class as a whole on the pretext of protecting their confidence in the economy. In other words, the book points out that India’s fiscal policy has been influenced considerably by the neo-liberal economic policy discourse.
Prabhat Patnaik sets the tone of the subject by mapping out the hostility of finance capital against government interventions.
CP Chandrasekhar argues that a striking feature of the period since 1989-90 till the current decade was that despite evidence of higher growth rates and signs of growing inequality, there was no improvement in the country’s ability to garner a larger share of resources to finance expenditure it considered crucial, largely on account of the tax concessions provided during the years of liberalisation.
SL Shetty expresses grave concern over the rapidly deteriorating socio-economic indicators, economic inequality and social deprivation which are likely to threaten the very social fabric, political stability and economic progress of India. He maps a whole gamut of issues relating to several dimensions of socio-economic inequality.
Saumen Chattopadhyay raises serious questions on the willingness of the government to tap potential resources.
T.M. Thomas Isaac and R. Ramakumar argue that 85 per cent of the social sector expenditure in India is spent through state government budgets, the fiscal capacity of the states playing a dominant role in determining the strength of any counter-cyclical fiscal policy of the Central Government.
Jayati Ghosh argues that despite a clear division of powers and responsibilities among different tiers of the government.
(Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd, B1/I-1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044; www.sagepub.in)
|
Previous Page (23/39) - Next Page (25/39) 
|
|
|