Current Issue
Organiser Home
The Moving Finger Writes
Media Watch
Thinking Aloud
Kids Org.
News Round-up
Readers’ Forum:
Kerala Newsletter

Previous Issues
September 04, 2011

August 28, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 14, 2011
August 07, 2011

July 31, 2011
July 24, 2011
July 17, 2011
July 10, 2011
July 03, 2011

June 26, 2011
June 19, 2011
June 12, 2011
June 05, 2011

May 29, 2011
May 22, 2011
May 15, 2011
May 08, 2011
May 01, 2011

April 24, 2011
April 17, 2011
April 10, 2011
April 03, 2011

March 27, 2011
March 20, 2011
March 13, 2011
March 06, 2011

February 27, 2011
February 20, 2011
February 13, 2011
February 06, 2011

January 30, 2011
January 23, 2011
January 16, 2011
January 09, 2011
January 02, 2011

December 26, 2010
December 19, 2010
December 12, 2010
December 05, 2010
November 28, 2010
November 21, 2010
November 14, 2010
November 7, 2010

October 31, 2010
October 24, 2010
October 17, 2010
October 10, 2010
October 03, 2010

2010 Issues
2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues

About us
Contact us


February 19, 2006
Organiser Home
Cover Page
North-east Newsletter
Youth Folio
Readers´ Forum
The Moving Finger Writes
Think it Over
In Focus
Media Watch
London Post
India That is Bharat
At Random
Sangh Samachar
Kids Org.

February 19, 2006

Page: 13/33

Home > 2006 Issues > February 19, 2006

HC quashes proceedings against S. Gurumurthy


Madras High Court, on January 31, quashed the entire case proceedings pending against S. Gurumurthy, a noted columnist, before the Kancheepuram Court following his articles in connection with the arrest of the Kanchi Acharya in the Sankararaman murder case.

Justice M. Jeyapaul quashed the proceedings while allowing a petition from Shri Gurumurthy seeking to quash the chargesheet filed in the Kancheepuram Court.

Shri Gurumurthy was charged for offences under Section 176, 179 read with Section 193 of IPC and Section 14 of the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867.

According to the police, with an intention to create false evidence and sidetrack the Special Investigation Team (SIT) from the murder case, Shri Gurumurthy wrote misleading articles in a English daily.

The judge said punishable provisions of law contemplated under Section 14 of the Press and Registration of Books Act did not apply to false statements in articles, either in dailies or journals. The petitioner had been wrongly charged based on total misconception of law for offences under Section 14 of the Press and Registration Act.

Section 176 of IPC contemplated punishment for omission to furnish information on any subject to any public servant. Section 179 stipulated punishment for refusal to answer a public servant. The petitioner written articles, expressing his point of view as a journalist. Irked by this, the Chief Investigating Officer summoned him under Section 160 of Cr.P.C. and grilled him, which did not take the investigating officer anywhere, he added.

Usually, journalists collected information from furtive sources and published it for public consumption. No one could attribute special knowledge to the journalist about the information he had adverted to in the article, the judge said.

The judge said the fact remained that even before the article was published, the Investigating Officer had got material information in the shape of the FIR and had also arrested the accused concerned. It was not as if the petitioner withheld vital information, which led the investigating officer to grope in the dark. Therefore, the question of withholding vital information did not arise in this case.

The petitioner was not supposed to answer any question relating to the article he had written to the officer investigating the murder case. He was bound to answer only with regard to Sankaraman?s murder. He had answered that he knew nothing of the murder, the judge added.

Previous Page Previous Page (12/33) - Next Page (14/33) Next Page

copyright© 2004 Bharat Prakashan(Delhi) Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Hosted by KSHEERAJA Web Solutions Pvt Ltd