Current Issue
Organiser Home
The Moving Finger Writes
Media Watch
Thinking Aloud
Kids Org.
News Round-up
Readers’ Forum:
Kerala Newsletter

Previous Issues
September 04, 2011

August 28, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 14, 2011
August 07, 2011

July 31, 2011
July 24, 2011
July 17, 2011
July 10, 2011
July 03, 2011

June 26, 2011
June 19, 2011
June 12, 2011
June 05, 2011

May 29, 2011
May 22, 2011
May 15, 2011
May 08, 2011
May 01, 2011

April 24, 2011
April 17, 2011
April 10, 2011
April 03, 2011

March 27, 2011
March 20, 2011
March 13, 2011
March 06, 2011

February 27, 2011
February 20, 2011
February 13, 2011
February 06, 2011

January 30, 2011
January 23, 2011
January 16, 2011
January 09, 2011
January 02, 2011

December 26, 2010
December 19, 2010
December 12, 2010
December 05, 2010
November 28, 2010
November 21, 2010
November 14, 2010
November 7, 2010

October 31, 2010
October 24, 2010
October 17, 2010
October 10, 2010
October 03, 2010

2010 Issues
2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues

About us
Contact us


April 25, 2010

Page: 9/39

Home > 2010 Issues > April 25, 2010

The Moving Finger Writes

Do we need foreign universities?

By MV Kamath

Oxford can be Oxford only in Oxford, and not in Noida. Tip to Kapil Sibal: Help our universities and colleges to upgrade themselves on a regular basis and await results. Think it over, Mr Minister. This is a nation that once produced Nalanda.

INDIA, by one account, has about 480 universities and about 22,000 colleges as of now. According to HRD Minister Kapil Sibal, India will need at least 800 more universities and another 35,000 colleges in the next ten years to help meet the percentage of students moving into the university system. Currently the percentage in India is 12.4 against global average of 23. In developed countries the percentage is above 40 and in some developed countries the figure is around 53. It only shows how much progress needs to be made in India to be competitive in the educational sphere.

The United States has 73 among the top 200 universities in the world. The United Kingdom has nine, including the universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial College, London and the Universities of Edinburg and Manchester. China has eight, but four of them are among the first fourteen. India has five. The IIT Mumbai ranks 24th, the IIT Kanpur ranks 29th, the Delhi University ranks the 130th and the IIT Chennai, 132nd. Anna University comes last among the first 200. For a country just 63 years old. India’s record is not as bad as it is made out, but obviously, it has a long way to go. Those students aspiring for better and higher education go abroad. According to available information, as many as 1,60,000 students leave the country annually to study abroad, costing the treasury as much as $ 7.5 billion (about Rs 34,500 crore) annually. That is a huge amount by any reckoning, which India can ill afford to spend. For one thing, a small percentage of Indians going abroad for studies do so not so much out of a deep desire to acquire knowledge, as much as it is a fashionable thing to do. Flaunting a foreign degree is supposed to indicate one’s social status, as much as a natural right to get top jobs.

Another percentage of students have as their aim the desire to acquire status as NRIs and consequently, alien citizenship. One understands that it is only a small percentage of students who really intend to return to their motherland to serve it. China sends several thousands of its scholars to western universities with a single-minded purpose to acquire knowledge for transmission, back home, to others. The result is that China is rapidly catching up with the United States in scientific and technological studies.

According to Thomson Reuters’ Golden Research Report 2009, in China “if it continues in the current trajectory, it will overtake the US before 2020”. China’s educational policy is two-fold; capacity building and liberal funding, both of which, given its foreign exchange reserves, it can afford. Thus, China’s gross spending in R & D grew at 18 per cent a year during the 10-year period from 1995 to 2006. Its R & D budget for 2009 was $ 25.7 billion, an increase of 25 per cent over 2008. Understandably, since 2000, China has been the second largest producer of scientific knowledge. China is single-minded in its pursuit of knowledge and training of its young graduates to take on teaching. Reports from the United States, British and Australian universities are full of praise for the discipline with which Chinese students pursue their studies. Indian students do not share that deserved reputation.

The HRD Minister obviously means well when he states that to meet the growing demand of the young and the educationally ambitious, we will need to set up 80 universities every year, besides 3,500 colleges under various classifications. Do we have the required trained staff to meet their needs? Again, foreign universities will inevitably turn out to be the preserve of the rich because of the high fees they will charge. The Government will have to face the obvious criticism that, in effect, it is merely meeting the needs of the rich and the affluent while being disdainful of the poor, a charge it will find it difficult to deny.

Two questions arise in this connection. We annually spend $ 7.5 billion to enable our students to study abroad. Fancy how much currently cash-starved colleges can achieve given even a fraction of the amount to upgrade themselves. Actually, we should strain to raise our present universities to international standards by developing what Nobel Laureate Venkataraman Ramakrishnan says is “a culture that would produce more cutting-edge research in science” thus providing “role models” for India’s young scientists of whom, he says, there are many in India.

Prof Ramakrishnan takes a dim view of the rush among foreign universities to set up campuses in India, saying that they are motivated purely “for business reasons”. Indeed, which of the foreign universities would really be anxious to establish their presence in India? Surely not Oxford, Cambridge, MIT, CalTech, Cornell, Princeton, Michigan or even Canada’s McGill? Some twenty foreign universities have apparently expressed their desire to set up their branches in India. In what fields of scientific knowledge have they shown class?

We don’t need universities to teach us law or literature. We need excellence in science, engineering, technology, medicine and management. Foreign universities should be judged by the quality of research papers they get published in reputed journals of international standing. In this realm, China again stands out. Apparently the number of papers published by Chinese scholars in international journals of note has risen from 20,000 in 1998 to 112,000 in 2008. That is some achievement. What India needs is not a dubious foreign university but trained teachers such as what the Fulbright Fellowship helps to provide. We should send people abroad to get training as teachers. That should suffice. We have all the talent needed and we don’t have to suffer from an inferiority complex.

According to Dr Ramakrishna, “whenever outstanding universities set up campuses, be it in Singapore or other places, they have not been able to reproduce the culture of the original place.” Oxford can be Oxford only in Oxford, and not in Noida. Tip to Kapil Sibal: Help our universities and colleges to upgrade themselves on a regular basis and await results. Dr. Ramakrishnan says : “There are some very good scientists in India who are doing work that is world class and internationally recognised. What India needs is more role models.” And support to its universities and colleges in every possible way. Think it over, Mr Minister. This is a nation that once produced Nalanda.

Previous Page Previous Page (8/39) - Next Page (10/39) Next Page

copyright© 2004 Bharat Prakashan(Delhi) Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Hosted by KSHEERAJA Web Solutions Pvt Ltd